!ScX9e2LWA6 (45 replies)
!ScX9e2LWA6 No.13438549 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Our black hole theory is wrong.

Take any transformation of the Schwarzchild metric. Substitute the event horizon coordinate 2GM. If the coordinate system contains a variation of the term (1 - r/2GM) as a multiplier or denominator the coordinates collapse.

This is true for both Kruskal Sezekeres and Eddington Finkelstein.

Singularities mean that geodesics cannot pass the coordinates and since the event horizon is a singularity of time, timelike geodesics (world lines) must terminate above the event horizon.

I conjecture that when this change is made, physicists will discover the workings of asymptotic Darkness, dark matter, galactic formation, and the big bang as well as a mathematical unification of physics through string theory.

In any event, it's fun to know that disproving black hole theory is something you can do at home.
40 posts and 8 images omitted
(338 replies)

/sfg/ - Space Flight General

No.13442831 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
previous >>13438550
333 posts and 87 images omitted
(26 replies)
No.13443447 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>people with 105IQ make more than people with 110IQ

Scientifically why does this happen?
21 posts and 1 image omitted
(59 replies)
No.13443789 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>The notion of Mengele as unhinged, driven by demons, and indulging grotesque and sadistic impulses should be replaced by something perhaps even more unsettling. Mengele was, in fact, in the scientific vanguard, enjoying the confidence and mentorship of the leaders in his field. The science he pursued in Auschwitz, to the extent that we can reconstruct it, was not anomalous but rather consistent with research carried out by others in what was considered to be the scientific establishment. That research was criminal—and monstrous—because of the absence of all barriers that ordinarily serve to contain and regulate the temptations and ambitions that can push scientific research across ethical boundaries. Relegating Mengele and his research to the ranks of the anomalous and bizarre is perhaps more palatable than understanding that he was the product—and promise—of a much larger system of thought and practice. It is easier to dismiss an individual monster than to recognize the monstrous that can emerge from otherwise respected and enshrined institutions.
>Mengele: Unmasking the "Angel of Death"
Why should I believe in science again? Why shouldn't I be sceptical of vaccines?? When science is responsible for the most disgusting cold-hearted atrocities in the past? Kuhn already dismantled this notion that science is about some linear progress rather than changing/competing paradigms.
54 posts and 5 images omitted
(17 replies)
No.13444220 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What are the best exercises for improving my strength, agility, stamina and so on? I don't care about look. I'm weak and I want to become a war machine.
12 posts and 1 image omitted
(11 replies)

Modelling Cognitive Development

No.13438459 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I argue that cognitive development can be modelled using a logistic function. Thoughts? Do note that the ages from 0-5 are deceiving, since the cognitive development fraction of a 5 year old in this logistic function is over 100 times larger than that of a newborn. Interesting is the rapid spike on the onset of puberty, where I set the midpoint of 50% development to be at the age of 12.5: the onset of puberty.
6 posts and 1 image omitted
(26 replies)

Okay /sci/ who has the highest power level?

No.13440792 ViewReplyOriginalReport
21 posts and 1 image omitted
(10 replies)
No.13444211 ViewReplyOriginalReport
UK seems to be on track for a 3rd wave. They will be locking down this winter.
5 posts omitted
(297 replies)

/sqt/ /qtddtot/ - stupid questions thread

No.13424060 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Previously >>13400494

>what is /sqt/ for?
Questions regarding math and science.
>where do I go for advice?
>>>/sci/scg
>where do I go for other questions and requests?
>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.
>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?
https://rentry.co/sci-latex-v1
>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?
https://scholar.google.com/
>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?
https://archived.moe/sci/
https://boards.fireden.net/sci/
>how do I optimize an image losslessly?
https://trimage.org/
https://pnggauntlet.com/

>where can I get:
>books?
https://spoon.wiki/Books
https://stitz-zeager.com/
https://openstax.org/
>articles?
sci-hub.st
>book recs?
https://sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide/
https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/booklist.html

>carreer advice?
https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/
>help with calculus?
https://spoon.wiki/WolframAlpha
>charts?
https://imgur.com/a/pHfMGwE
https://imgur.com/a/ZZDVNk1
>tables, properties and material selection?
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/
http://www.matweb.com/

General advice for asking questions here:
>attach an image (animal images are best. Grab them from >>>/an/)
>avoid replying to yourself
>ask anonymously
>remember to check the Latex with the Tex button on the posting box
>if someone replies to your question with a shitpost, ignore it
>avoid arguing with Yukarifag
>do not tell us you came from whatever the fuck board, /pol/ in particular
>do not mention how [other place] didn't answer your question so you're reposting it here
>if you need to ask for clarification fifteen times in a row, try to make the sequence easy to read through
>I'm not reading your handwriting
>If it ain't english I can't speak it
292 posts and 71 images omitted
(269 replies)

/mg/ - maths general

No.13425008 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Formerly, >>13389731
Hairer edition
Talk about math
264 posts and 54 images omitted