>>13442584>>Your metabolism slows down and this happens>I run twice a day and eat 70% of my recommended intake. My metabolism is fine. Additionally I also do IF, which should further reduce metabolism, but still I'm fine.
A lower metabolism doesn't mean unhealthy, it means the cells are 'running slower' so to speak.>>but its very little and has no real effect on humans>you can't possibly prove this
It's already been proven.
Small rodents life a longer live with less caloric intake but they've tested this on larger mammals and the results diminished exponentially. There's no reason to assume humans will be different in this.>such as?
ketosis is not necessarily a perk
Neurogenesis is flat out false
Autophagy? Up or down regulation not specified doesn't mean anything.>improvement of heart and liver function
Could be but this statement is too broad and vague.>stem cell regen
Misrepresented or wrong, unclear what is meant by this.>immune boosting
Not as far as I know.>anti-cancer properties
Not really also cancer is very broad so again this statement is hollow.>GH production improvement
Not proven to be beneficial in anti-aging.>UV can't penetrate your skin to help generate vitamin D if you wear sunscreen
So far vitamin D production isn't lowered in any significance and the risk reduction of skin cancer still outweighs it. Wearing sunscreen is proven in reducing aging of the skin.>Most of what you said is unaccurate.
No, unless you can cite valid sources which support your claims.