>>3887097>with my own eyesAgain, get off Twitter, and dni irl with Twitterites.
I have witnessed enough discourse to choke a mule, and I still had to look up "cotton ceiling" on Wikipedia. Your "movement" is a stub with one line, which the mods have marked for "excessive citation." That's why I ignored it, even you kinda ignored it, tacking it to the end of your post. You admittedly didn't even "get into" it. Of course I ignored it. It seemed minor in your post, and further research tells me that it's minor elsewhere.
>because it is based on biological sex and not pronounsIt's based on both.
I'm presuming you're not being a grammar nut and "pronouns" is synecdoche for gender identity.
I don't know if they're the ones who are misunderstanding, or if it's you, but being gay is also an identity, it's not purely based on biological sex. Gay men have their own gendered tendencies and expectations, just as straight women do.
The discourse I've seen tryna cancel gay guys which actually has some heft and spread is based on how, at the end of the day, they're still dudes, which comes with male privilege. Gay guys tend to be the most transphobic of queer communities, they're highly associated with liberalism instead of radicalism, they're idealize bourgeois lifestyles, they're libertines, and the sex-negative attitudes of many of the current generation sees people being horny on main as meaning they're perverts, all that noise.
desu, It's not entirely baseless
Just look at this board
Look around you, at all these homosexuals who come here to celebrate the beauty and eroticism of the male form while deriding other queer identities and women. You can't even talk about queer issues without the chuds butting in to say something dumb with a mouth full of shit. There are too many gays here who constantly betray the community that's protected their right to be who they are in public.
