>Mycology is the branch of biology concerned with the study of fungi
Historically, mycology was a branch of botany because, although fungi are evolutionarily more closely related to animals than to plants, this was not recognized until a few decades ago
What was the Demon Core for specifically for? (5 replies)
Thinking about making an app that lets you tickle the dragons tail. I am going to do some research about it but as a starter thought I might ask some smart guys. What were the exact objectives of the experiments with the demon core? Like what measurements were gathered by getting the darn thing into such a dangerous state.
Gemfibrozil is in the fibric acid derivatives drug class, which inhibits the production of very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs) and enhances VLDL clearance by stimulating lipoprotein lipase activity. This primarily results in reducing triglycerides and raising HDL-C. One of the earlier trials, the Helsinki Heart Study, assessed the impact of gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia (non-HDL ? 200 mg/dL). In this placebo-controlled randomized control trial 600 mg of gemfibrozil two times daily for 5 years resulted in an increase of HDL-C by more than 10% and a reduction in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides by 8%, 8%, 12%, and 35%, respectively. The primary end points of coronary heart disease—fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiac death—incidence was reduced by 34%.
Anyone got a quick useful source on understanding Antenna gain? Specifically Antenna gain pattern
I need to model Antenna gain for an assigment and I've never took a course about Antennas before.
They gave us chapter 6 of constantine but it was overwhelming and I don't think I understand it.
We discuss clinical practice and research, DO NOT offer advice (just fucking go see your doctor) make fun of premeds and shitpost. Please keep vaccination/clamping/vitamin K/soliciting advice out of this thread and start your own because it takes a lot of space.
>inb4 not science >inb4 poor amerimutts wanting medical advice
Malcolm Gladwell mentioned in his book that for someone to master something, 10k hours need to be spent intensively practicing that thing... backed by "social science" research
I think this what happens going through a master's program. My question is... is it possible to cut this time by half and still achieve this mastery non-pseudo?
I mean in business you learn much faster taking high (calculated) risks... what would be the equivalent in science and learning in general?
