in the last thread we concluded that 1 != 0
now I know this was VERY impressive and that I should take a break, but I will now prove that 1 != 2
Now firstly by definition using penis axioms 1 != 2.
Good.
But many people look at hitomi and laugh
>uhhhh hurr durr this is dumb cuz uhhhh like that implies 1 = 2
>durr 0*h = 1 => 2*0*h = 2*1 given x*2 = 0, uhhhh durr then 0*h = 2 durr 1 = 2
the elementary return of 0*h is E[0*h] = E[1]
the Hitomi return is H[0*h] = H[1] = 0
This is because elementary numbers aren't Hitomi numbers so evaluating the Hitomi return of one is 0.
it's the same idea for a complex number z = 2 + 0i, Re(z) = 2, Im(z) = 0
you violate the idea of equivalence by multiplying two on both sides because you're you're comparing the Asuka field to the elementary one, where [2*0*h] is not an equivalent operation because the two is inside the field the equila statement is 2*[h*0] = [h*0] + [h*0], since h*0 is the definition of a unitary object.
otherwise 2 = 1 would be a restatement saying 2 is the unitary object.
ergo 0/0 = 1, but 1 != 0 or 2
This is all a work in progress.

What about also having 4channel's /soc/ without all transsexuals and cocks and stuff? Like normal people that share scientific experience?

Real world math problem for you /sci/.

You order a pizza, and the pizza place estimates 210 calories per slice (in the traditional wheel slice) for a large 14" pizza with 8 slices. You only have 630 calories left for the day on your diet. However, when you arrive at the pizza place to pick it up, you discover that they have instead sliced it into 9 pieces in a non-traditional box slice, like so, instead of the wheel slice. Assume the pizza employee is very accurate and all four cuts are equidistant such that if the pizza were a square, every slice would have the same area.

Which slices should be chosen from the grid to get closest to 630 calories without going over?

>makes binomial expansion quick and easy
Based.

Also, post cool properties of the triangle.

>picrel
Proper fucking retard innit? Guy could've given it more thought but no, he went with the most obvious thing you could possibly conclude from less than a minute's worth of brain power. Oh well, what did we expect from a faggot anyway?

why does the galaxy spin around? is everything was born in the big bang there's no reason something would start spinning outa nowhere

the spin momentum is generated when a kinetic force object meets on its trajectory another object

this doesn't make any sense

Cuboctahedron is literally the most based shape in existence.

Show us you know what you are talking about by predicting the future until the year 2050. For bonus points predict til 2100.

Thoughts on mixing the vaccines?

How far would you sacrifice for science? How many lives and enviromental damage would you accept for further progress?
Soviets irradiated half a millon people willingly to advance nuclear technology. Thousands died in the rocket develompent. Entire regions irreversibely polluted. But the result is successful in the end.

Would you do the same? What would you be willing to give up for Moon colonization? For the first man on Mars? Do you think sacrifices like those are necessary do achieve development as fast as possible?