Threads by latest replies - Page 3497

(5 replies)

assigning probability weights to many-parameter combinations

No.13364265 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I have a mathematical problem

Let's say I'm making a video game that revolves around (not completely) randomly generated characters
each character is built from component parts, each with associated rarity
for example, eye colour, would have 25% blue and 75% brown
skin colour would be most often lighter tones
hair colour would be often brown, sometimes blonde, rarely ginger, etc...
at this point it would be easy to create a generator that selects parameters one at a time... however I feel this would be too random, and create ugly characters
so I want to add conditions that forbid, or make less likely, certain combinations
For example, a dark skinned character should usually have darker hair... a white character would only rarely have woolly afro hair, ginger hair is likely to have freckles etc...
and to add another complication, I'd like there to be a feature where you can "lock" a certain trait while rolling a random character.

What is the most efficient way I can organise all these dependent, related probabilities?
The most inefficient way to do this would be a many dimensional matrix, or very long list, to store weights of every possible combination. Surely there are better ways to do this.
(29 replies)

Delegitimizing scientific establishment

No.13365349 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I have this intuition that scientific establishment is driven by ideology rather than search for truth and I want to see what data there is to support this view. Can you point to examples of valid research being censored for political reasons?
The lancet letter comes to mind, but that's more of a statement of opinion rather than a fact. For example censoring research on race and IQ or IQ and genetics.
24 posts and 8 images omitted
(42 replies)

Wikipedia condemned for bias and unscientificness by founder.

No.13364979 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Wikipedia Is More One-Sided Than Ever
https://www.theepochtimes.com/wikipedia-co-founder-warns-wikipedia-is-more-one-sided-than-ever_3887650.html
Larry Sanger, a co-founder of Wikipedia, warned that the online encyclopedia is “more one-sided than ever” in light of the website’s entries for Black Lives Matter, the 2020 election, former President Donald Trump’s two impeachments, and other contentious topics.

Sanger, in particular, took issue with how some Wikipedia entries are sourced.

“In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources—and sources friendly to globalist progressivism—are permitted,” he wrote in an article on his website.

Several centrist news outlets like The Daily Telegraph, The Wall Street Journal, and The Weekly Standard are sometimes allowed to be sourced, he said, but Wikipedia editors are “careful never to leave the current Overton Window of progressive thought.”

Unlike Facebook Inc. and Twitter, which take more top-down approaches to content moderation, Wikipedia, which turned 20 years old earlier this year, largely relies on unpaid volunteers to handle issues around users’ behavior, editing entries, and other aspects of the site’s management.

Wikipedia has 230,000 volunteer editors who work on crowdsourced articles and more than 3,500 “administrators” who can take actions like blocking accounts or restricting edits on certain pages, according to a Reuters article.

Further, Sanger suggested, Wikipedia’s editors have “systematically purged conservative mainstream media sources” because its editors “do not want what they dismiss as ‘misinformation,’ ‘conspiracy theories,’ etc., to get any hearing. In saying so, they (and similarly biased institutions) are plainly claiming exclusive control over what is thinkable. They want to set the boundaries of the debate, and they want to tell you how to think about it.”
37 posts and 4 images omitted
(279 replies)

REGRET TAKING OFFICIAL IQ TEST

No.13353783 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
took an official iq test by an actual psychologist via my university department a few months ago only to score a fucking 110.Hell I even kind of studied for it by taking practice exams online (of course not legit)


ever since then my self confidence has completely destroyed and my anxiety has increased. Overall my grades have fallen although this is most definately a placebo, altough a very real one.

Dont ever fucking take this bullshit test. My dreams to become a mathematician are now ruined (110 iq for math is asking for trouble and depression from failure).

FUCK IM NOT EVEN IN THE BRACKET FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE WHICH IS 120.

WHATT THE FUCK I RGRET THIS SO MUCH
274 posts and 36 images omitted
(5 replies)
(10 replies)
No.13362710 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Theoretically speaking, would it be possible for humans to evolve into that many subspecies?
5 posts omitted
(10 replies)
No.13365120 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Ahem...

We will never leave the solar system

thank you
5 posts and 1 image omitted
(144 replies)

Gender identity

No.13361694 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Is it all bullshit? Is there an actual science to it? I hear arguments saying that modern biology agrees with the concept. Is sex different than gender?
139 posts and 18 images omitted
(37 replies)

Negative correlation between fertility and IQ; different among races

No.13363632 ViewReplyOriginalReport
IQ is negatively correlated with fertility in most parts of the world, the only exception being Scandinavia to my knowledge. Within the US it also differs among races, with the fertility-IQ correlation being worst among hispanics and blacks, less among whites. Note this is based on polygenic scores, not IQ tests

A result of this is that the black-white genetic IQ gap is widening over time. The genetic component of that 17 point gap is like about 13-14 already and its widening about a point a generation at this rate.
32 posts and 5 images omitted
(7 replies)
No.13366005 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is this really a mathematical certainty?
2 posts and 1 image omitted