>>13365480>this is an open debate and you will find scientists who argue that the IQ gap is - at least in part - due to genetics, therefore your conspiracy theory doesn't hold.This is intellectually dishonest, as fuck. This is exactly what anons are saying - that some scientists do indeed believe that genetics contributes to intelligence. Actually I'm an MS student in cog sci, and although intelligence isn't my area of specialization, I would say that pretty much everyone practicing cog sci or biology today would agree that BOTH genetics and environment contribute to intellectual and other psychological differences, both on an individual level and population level.
Nobody is claiming that there is a conspiracy. The claim being made is simply that some (basically all) scientists agree that BOTH genetic and environmental factors contribute to difference in intelligence, but pop culture, mainstream journalism, big tech, and even many academics in the humanities categorically deny this fact. In fact, this information is basically non-existent in mainstream discourse, and not only that, but if you attempt to bring nuance into the discussion, you will be described as a racist, a neonazi, and conspiracy theorist, much as you are doing now, even if you are literally not white or you are a liberal.
So basically, you are just restating what we are claiming - namely that many scientists do take seriously the idea that genetic contributes to differences in intelligence - but then you are misconstruing our argument and presenting it as if were are making claims of an organized and orchestrated conspiracy to intentionally suppress information, when nobody has made such claims. Once again, nobody is arguing for an orchestrate conspiracy. The point is simply that the academic debate is much more nuanced than what is presented in public, which is not at all unusual, but what is unusual is that if you critique mainstream discourse on the topic, you'll be labeled a nazi/racist.
