Threads by latest replies - Page 3531
Anonymous
hi /sci/ how can I bring my self to love and be passionate about science?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13356317 I think you are disappointed in yourself that you are not interested in the mainstream sciences, and that's okay anon. You don't need to force yourself to love science, but if you want to, you first need to appreciate it. Continue to study whatever STEM you are studying, and then eventually you may come to a point where you are encorporating mainstream sciences - a point which you will appreciate and perhaps love it.
This happened for me recently when studying calculus of variations. I didn't really appreciate the Newton's equations for motions until I derived them using the Euler-Lagrange equations and saw them in that context. Now I'm starting to really appreciate the application of mathematics in physics. I hope this helps eurobro
Enoch
>my parents cared about my grades >now I refuse to do anything >it's my parents fault
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13356446 >faggot didn't read OP's post Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13356317 you can't force yourself to like something, just find topics until you truly find one you have a passion about (like literally obsessed with it).
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13356317 >needing to revise Ngmi low IQlet
Anonymous
I have always thought not, but then I saw the brightest mind of our time say 'irregardless'.
Anonymous
>>13355615 THAT, IS WHY, I SAID, "O-N A-V-E-R-A-G-E"
Anonymous
>>13355633 Yes thanks, faggot. We're clearly talking about Lex here. The average case hardly matters.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13355640 I am dumb, I was not paying attention to the topic of the thread
AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
you win
I need to stop arguing on the internet
rgstrstjrtjdrtjdrtjdrtj
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13353992 It's more of a knowledge thing than an IQ thing, but the simple fact is that many people on /sci/, /lit/, and /pol/ who consider themselves educated are nothing more than pseuds. They expect people to gloss over their redneck-tier writing and marvel at their stellar minds, but it's just not happening.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13353992 I winced a little when I heard Lex say that. He almost never makes a mistake though so I gave it a pass. I could see myself possibly doing something similar if I were anxious and talking to someone 1-on-1. The real unforgivable thing is if someone puts it in writing.
Anonymous
does anyone here have the original meme? it was about real analysis, with one of the characters wearing a blindfold
Anonymous
Hey /sci/ will I make it in the IT and land a successful 6 figure code monkey job with this iq,I don't know if I'm smart enough to actually contribute something positive in that field . I'm also new to coding. Btw will I be able to be make it computer science or heck physics,mathematics by the off chance and be a successful researcher and land that dream come true tenured position or at the very least land a top job at an investment bank?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13355178 >people are born genius If you believe this you shouldn't be on sci because you believe in superstition
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13355187 you're about a 3.5/10 bro. post a better picture next time. too much camera distortion. don't worry looks aren't everything in life
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13353621 I skipped all the cube questions and a couple of others. got 28/38. You would score nowhere near 133 in an actual IQ test. more like 115 at best
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13355041 >Furthermore it isn't as g-loaded as many verbal subtest oddly enough Not really, language is more fundamental than any domain touched upon by matrix reasoning type tests.
Anonymous
Axiom of choice doesn't seem to make sense when talking about dense ordered sets, yet it is used as a justification for many statements in branches that range from measure theory to abstract algebra. Is there any substitute for Zorn's lemma or any other variant that doesn't require outlandish assumptions?
Links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zorn%27s_lemma#Equivalent_forms_of_Zorn's_lemma
http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/121981/2/memoria.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_choice
Anonymous
>set theory >>ZFC >that doesn't require outlandish assumptions?
Anonymous
>>13357040 >the entirety of set theory is built on axiomatic assumptions. It's like being mad that there's shit in the toilet. Linear Algebra becomes useless without axiom of choice though, surely there must be a workaround for this
Enoch
Quoted By:
>cope theory
Anonymous
>>13357042 The finite version of the AOC is not controversial.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13357147 yes but some vector spaces become severely limited if we ignore it, if any of those turned out to have useful applications then we are in trouble
Anonymous
What programming language(s) do mathematicians use?
Anonymous
>>13356457 > write a lisp compiler from sicp > write the symbolic algebra system in lisp Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13356750 No you need to do it in assembly only no cheating by being smart. No assembly macrocode you program another assembly program to compile like roller coaster tycoon either.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13355321 >Not needing 10 layers of abstraction and multiple library black-boxes to do basic array manipulation not going to make it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13356346 That's a boomerjak though
Anonymous
Anonymous
How many revolutionary ideas in math and physics have been lost because the guy who scribbled them down decided they were schizo and left them collecting dust?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
The Maestro:
Enoch
Quoted By:
>>13353659 Euler, Leibniz, Bernoulli, Cauchy, etc...
the youth should know the truth progenitors calculus.
END THE HISTORY OF LIES AND IRRELEVANCE
WE NEED NOT CORRUPT THE YOUTH WITH FABRICATIONS OF THE HOLOHOAX BUT RATHER OF THE HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS, THE DIVINE STUDY.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13351641 Hundreds of thousands.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13354116 So? The plane exists. Nothing was lost. Are you retarded? The OP is about ideas being lost, not about bullies bullying people and other page six society bullshit.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13352604 >human mind acts like an antennae that can pick up the signal, and I reasoned that those antennae could be reproduced artificially. For my part, I've already done my share of receiving, but the act of interpreting the information and sharing it changes the future and advances our level of technology each time, so the picture of the future changes with each interaction on this side of the timeline. Schizo shit. Prove it.
Anonymous
Why do Elon Musk and SpaceX make /sci/ seethe? For a board supposedly about science and math, people shit on SpaceX and Elon 24/7
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13356203 You know, that's actually a fair enough point.
Anonymous
>>13342680 Pol is like super obsessed with the dude, which is a little off-putting desu.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13345838 >>13345795 >basically impossible to track with traditional dishes This is incorrect. Traditional, parabolic dishes are what SpaceX uses for uplink and high quality downlink. They do need to be aimed and track the satellites in real time. The issue is you need two of them because they have to physically move to jump from one satellite to another which may take a second to two. If you had only one your internet would go down every few minutes for a couple seconds. These auto aiming parabolic dishes are commercially available but they aren't exactly cheap.
Phased arrays can switch from one satellite to another within milliseconds, actually with proper signal processing they can connect tot multiple satellites simultaneously. But the issues is they need hundreds of transmitters and receivers, which is costly. But it hasn't really been done at consumer scale before so there is room for specialized silicon to lower prices.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13356345 >desu kill yourself, you dumb fucking weeb
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13356345 Everyone is obsessed with the dude.
Anonymous
Where can you find the PDFs, bros? I need to help someone with their physics class, but I can't find the textbook online. It's the fifth edition of College Physics by Alan Giambattista.
Anonymous
https://libgen.is/ take this and delete your thread
Anonymous
>>13357044 Just found the 3rd edition on z-lib desu
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13357048 Noooo stop damagin much maximum capacity limit
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13357054 Thanks. It's very similar to the fifth edition.
Anonymous
You’ve got a virgin universe, complete with all fields, but no matter at all except for one star and a clock that is running on the star’s surface. Of course that means that nowhere in your universe is space a flat, perfect, cubic coordinate system because the star is bending it somewhat, everywhere. Even very very far away from the star space is still curved by the star’s mass even though the distortion is so slight that only God can see it.
Anonymous
Enoch
Quoted By:
>>13355255 it doesn't move, it just is at the instance.
whereas the case for movement as they interact is different.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13355446 > is there anything that can increase/decrease the “stiffness” of space? longditudinal waves of charge density resonance through the impedance of free space
Consider the relativistic interpretation of magnetism as given
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TKSfAkWWN0&ab_channel=Veritasium alongside general notes on spacetime stiffness
https://physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/stiffness.pdf now, intuitively, if space is not perfectly rigid, than just like any fluid it can has
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WffR6HrEqTA&t=50s&ab_channel=FloWaveOceanEnergyResearchFacility now, consider the impedence of free space
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impedance_of_free_space in the context of
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_resonance Finally target longditudinal waves of charge density
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00792R000500240001-6.pdf and target a hyperbolic spiral geometry
https://www.flickr.com/photos/sandrabeaver/6809434710 Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13355255 >At time t=0, you will a planet into existence a distance d away from the star. More interesting:
>With a 50% duty cycle where P=1 planck second, you will a planet into existence a distance d away from the star. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>You’ve got a virgin universe
