Wtf is this bullshit? Why some so-called scientists think wr live in matrix? What is this pseudo-religious bullshit? Sometimes it looks like pseudo-science like this is religion for atheists

How fucked am I for college if I got a C in Porn class? Should I even bother applying to MIT?

Everything is pre determined and sentience is an illusion, yes?

My gf has gone full retard. At first she was saying that she's deistic and that religion isn't making any sense to her, and now she's saying that she's agnostic atheist.
Normally, I wouldn't have had any problems with that. What's really bothering me is how ignorant she is, yet how much she believes in science.
She doesn't know about Newtonian physics, she doesn't know about quantum physics, she doesn't know much about history, philosophy, theology, or even simple logic and reasoning.
She refuses to actually listen to me, a CS PhD candidate, with a background heavy in all what's mentioned above, and instead, just googles whatever disproves the existence of God/religion/etc.

What am I missing? is that why the church burned women?
I seriously tried being as unbiased as possible, and present easy to understand logical arguments, to get her to reason her way around that shit, but to no avail.

Help?

Is it possible to stay awake forever? Like if someone took an adrenaline shot every 15 minutes, would they be able to stay awake forever?

I'm about to receive my B.Sc. degree and came in touch with some "real scientists"

do all scientists spend their time writing one pointless paper after another?

I recently just graduated from a decent UC with a 3.8 so I'm already doing pretty shit for grad school. Last year the subject GRE got cancelled due to covid. Thanks to this and the fact that I am worthless trash I got rejected everywhere I applied, how can I get a good score (>=95%) this time around to make sure this doesn't happen again? I already lost a year of my life.

$\frac{\partial \textbf u}{\partial t} = -(\textbf u \cdot \nabla)\textbf u + \textit v\nabla^2\textbf u + \textbf f$

What's $\nabla^2$ mean? I know it's divergent, but why is it divergent squared? Or is it divergent of u squared? But then why isn't the square after the u?

>NOOOOO YOU CAN'T SAY THAT THATS A LOGICAL FALLACY!
>LOGICAL FALLACY YOUR ARGUMENT IS INVALLID!
>UHMMM NO THATS A LOGICAL FALLACY BECAUSE...
how do you deal with this /sci/?

PROOF THAT nu-SCIENCE IS A LIE.

YOU CANT MAKE THIS UP.

Fucking Harvard of all universities said they have undeniable proof of transgenders being valid and the first study I found is completely bogus.

They studied a sample size of FIFTY people (that's nothing) and found that MTF transgenders have a female sized INAH3 in their brain but evidence has already confirmed that HOMOSEXUAL men have a female sized INAH3 so this study is not proof of transgenders being valid at all. It simply suggests they studied fifty people and found that MTF transgenders were likely gay men.

Proof of the lies:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18980961/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/INAH_3

Read these if you want to do independent validation of their inconclusive shoddy study.

Nobody has the balls to look at a study anymore and verify it for yourself? It is clear they are outright trying to deceive you becaus of it.