Threads by latest replies - Page 3476
Anonymous (5 replies)
Suppose I give you beads on a line of parallel circular tracks, all connected by springs at tension.
I pull the first particle. What happens?
Did you set up differential equations, or did you see the waves run down the spring?
Anonymous
>>13370360 I’m going to not do any of that and watch tentacle porn now
Anonymous
>>13370360 >Suppose I give you beads on a line of parallel circular tracks, all connected by springs at tension. >I pull the first particle. What happens? holy word salad batman
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13370360 >parallel circular tracks Not an aphant, but I imagined parallel circular tracks and got picrel
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13370389 It's a meme. Some autist posted this garbage a couple weeks back.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13370376 why would you do a thing like that?
Anonymous (5 replies)
Post the worst examples of inscrutable pixel art.
Anonymous (34 replies)
What is /sci/'s honest opinion on math? Do you guys like it? Do we need it?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13370199 >completely divorced from reality >physics written in math doubt
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13369818 I love math but I fucking hate proofs because I'm a retard loser who can't write them. Dat feel when prooflet. Gonna hang myself soon, fuck this gay life.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13369818 >What is /sci/'s honest opinion on math? Mathematics is truth and light
>Do you guys like it? Yes, except for when we don't
>Do we need it? Is this even a question?
>>13371352 >Not understanding what a limit is >disdainforplebs.jpg Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13369905 What do you mean by those random strings of characters? To communicate with others, you first need to specify what dialect of what specific language you are using.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13370199 This is literally the perfect caricature of the midwit premed faggots who think they're smarter than they actually are.
Honestly good post anon.
Anonymous (5 replies)
I used to have nightmares about this thing creating a black hole that would devour the world.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
i worried about this but never dreamed it i did have dreams when i was a young child about the sun exploding all the time they finally went away and then i learn about micronovas from schizotube i come form a line of mentally unstable psychics
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13371206 i created a black hole of debt for people who aren't interested in worthless particle research
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>he doesn't know about progressive rationalization or logical positivism
Anonymous (5 replies)
>Be a theoryfag
>Can't find a job
At least i can be an interesting wagie i guess.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13373001 Evolutionary biology and philosophy of science
Anonymous (28 replies)
Here is a quote by Kronecker
>I recognize a true scientific value - in
the field of mathematics - only in concrete mathematical truths, or, to put it more
pointedly, only in mathematical formulas. These, as the history of mathematics shows,
are the only essential thing. The various theories regarding the foundations of mathematics (such as that of Lagrange) have over time fallen by the wayside, but the Lagrange resolvent remains.
So apparently Lagrange has developed some kind of foundations of mathematics, but I can't find anything about it. Does anyone know what his foundations looked like?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13369867 check out the trivium method if you are seriously asking this question.
The book by sister marium joesph goes into
>the nature of language once you pass these fundamentals, you will understand this quote
Thank you for sharing this quote; exquisitely said
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13370176 That doesn't make sense. There are plenty of things in math that are beyond the purview of physics
Anonymous
>>13370309 wait, antitranny is german? or are you someone else?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13372675 I'm not German, but I did study it for 4 (?) years. It's very rusty after not being used for anything, but yeah.
Reading List OP !7Reiet0x4U (30 replies)
Hello /sci/. As you know the math guide provided in the sticky is incomplete and outdated. I figure with all the recent textbook recommendation generals popping up lately, it may be best to make a single, official spreadsheet of textbook recommendations for each major subject/discipline (math, physics, EE, etc.) starting with math.
Pic related is how I'll be organizing a list of textbook recommendations. I will be active in the thread to read all discussion/debate relating to a particular text so that we can collectively decide whether or not a given text is worthy of being on our list.
There's a lot of shit to enter, but all I ask of you when you make a recommendation is provide enough information so I can find the book you're talking about, AS WELL AS STATE THE DIFFICULTY LEVEL (important) as it relates to pic related.
This is /sci/'s official reading rec. list, so as always you can make recommendations as to how things are being formatted, etc. Thank you!
>Difficulty Scale:
Basic (Undergraduate or below)
Advanced Undergraduate
Graduate
Advanced Graduate
Post-Graduate
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Some more recommendations: "Algebra, Chapter 0" by Aluffi. I guess that some people dont like it, but i think its a good introduction to abstract algebra. its accessible for undergrads. Worth noting that it takes a category theory approach early on, which is not the standard for the average algebra class "Homotopical topolgy" by fuchs, fermenko. good book on algebraic topology. needs some mathematical maturity "Complex Geometry" by Huybrechts its about complex geometry (duh). a more advanced subject in general
Anonymous
Paul Feyerabend - Against reason
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13371982 *Against Method
Anonymous
>>13365741 >As you know the math guide provided in the sticky is incomplete and outdated. Which is why the wikia exists
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13372869 To be fair the mathematics guide on there is quite good I think. The physics one needs some work, though so this should be the physics edition probably.
Anonymous (16 replies)
can a mother with small tits produce a daughter with big tits?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13372233 >kid wearing a Hillary 2016 button This has to be shopped.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13372182 Yes. Half the genes come from the father.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13372182 The size of a girl's tits is directly proportional to the amount of leftover cum is in the uterus after conception. The excess cum gets stored in the tits and multiplies to make them bigger but more cum multiplies more. That's why milk is white
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13372182 Hormones are more relevant than genes
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13372212 if the mother of the husband has big tits does that mean the husband has manboobs?
Anonymous (20 replies)
Scientifically speaking what is the reason for this?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>13371471 accidental poisoning = drugs and alcohol
and these zoomer bitches cant fuckin drive
and tyrone got the gat
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Spike starts years before the pandemic >Iz cuz dez not vazinated! Absolutely amazing.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13372668 they don't think it be like that but tyrone do be killin niggaz tho
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13371651 >>13372379 >>13372390 The waifu era is upon us. Don't give up now bros.
Anonymous (19 replies)
Can any anon help convert this small piece of code from C++ to C# please...
in particular I'm having trouble with the if statement in C# as intellisense states:
"Operator ! cannot be applied to operand of type int"
#include "iostream" // less than and greater than are disabled
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
unsigned int sum = 0;
for(int i = 1; i < 1001; ++i)
if(!(i % 3) && !(i % 5))
sum += i;
std::cout << i;
return 0;
}
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13367499 implicit bool conversion is what makes sepples superior
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13367455 I'm sorry anon but if you can't write something as simple as this shit, you're just not going to make it in CS. You should be able to write this in literally under a minute.
Anonymous
>>13367455 C and C++ implicitly convert any integer that is not 0 to true, and false otherwise. C didn't even have bools. I'm shocked that C# can't do this, I thought that this was standard. Just change i % 3 to i % 3 != 0.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13372702 > I'm shocked that C# can't do this to avoid bugs and honestly it is a horrible design choice when it works for every integral types like pointers
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13367487 I read this as
>not your personal tranny discord group