Threads by latest replies - Page 2562

(19 replies)
No.13668115 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Bros... I need to get to the bottom of the glass in science because I just took a gulp of science and it hurt my believe in God.

I used to think that because of how universal the believe for something supernatural is, it must be coded in us, it's a proof of something actually existing besides this reality because of how universal it is. Then there's the artistic side of humans, how can we create such beautiful things, why is Earth and life so beautiful if there's no God?

Then I realized, the universality of supernatural believes can be explained with evolutionary psychology. Also, the artistic and self-expressionist (soul) side of people can be explained with evolutionary psychology as well, it's literally in the fossil records. The beautiful things that we see are just monkey brain delusions, the compassion exists is because of evolutionary benefits, moral is truly subjective and the only thing that stops me from doing what ever could occur in my mind is my monkey brain delusions. Also, as it seems why universe is so huge if God created it just for life on Earth? It being huge just supports the theory of chance, no creator.

The only thing that's holding me float is that life just seem too fucking unreal to be a result of coincidence. This is probably just a monkey brain delusion, my brains just think that way because I can't put the dots together.

It's all just monkey brain rewards and illusions, there's nothing else to this. This is all we are, isn't it?

Please help, I want to believe in God again, give a scientific argument on behalf of why a God could exist.
14 posts and 4 images omitted
(10 replies)
No.13665502 ViewReplyOriginalReport
How do we prevent dopamine tolerance?
5 posts omitted
(14 replies)
No.13663491 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Why do humans have glaring biological flaws that you would think would have been eliminated through the hundreds of thousands of years of evolution?
For one example, eyesight. My eyes are bad. I am not blind, but without contacts or glasses it is dangerous for me to drive a vehicle. I can make out objects clearly but not details.
If I had been born 50,000 years ago I would have died in my early teenage years old because of this.
So why is bad eyesight still so common in humans?

Another one that comes to mind is childbirth. Giving birth is flat out dangerous for human females much of the time. It makes no biological sense that many if not most women have to endure such pain and physical trauma to the body to give birth, which can kill them.

A third example is the lumbar spine. What the fuck is that? The function of of your entire lower body relies upon this central column of bones that is also supporting the entire weight of your upper body being pulled downwards by gravity. Most people injure this area of their body at some point in their lives. Many deal with issues stemming from their lower back for their entire lives. You can often survive today from a broken back because of modern medicine, knowledgable nursing, and the non-scarcity of food and water which allows for you to be fed and hydrated even if you can’t walk. 50,000 years ago this would not have been the case. A crippling lower back injury, even one that would eventually heal, would likely be fatal.

Why are we so poorly “designed”?
9 posts omitted
(7 replies)

Failed drug test due to vaccine??

No.13668510 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Not here to argue about vaccines. Just kinda freaked out. My livelihood is at stake.

I haven't touched drugs or even weed since high school. I haven't even taken a Tylenol in at least 2 months.

>be me. Good career in oil and gas that requires regular drug testing
>don't do drugs of any type
>today at lunch time get covid shot (pfeizer)
>2 pm have a drug and Alcohol test.
>fail test for "synthetic opiates "

Could the shot make me fail?
I haven't eaten poppy seeds or any thing else I can imagine triggering a positive?

I've tried searching up individual ingredients that may cause a false positive but nothing seems to fit.

I begged for them to send the sample to head office for detailed analysis as I've got a perfect 6+ year of clean tests. Hopefully they have more detailed tests there.

How could I test positive for something I've never done in my life??
2 posts omitted
(28 replies)

Universities are a Giant Scam

No.13666436 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Universities are a fucking scam. I hate this shit so fucking much, I can't stand two weeks of it, I can't imagine doing it for another 4 years (at least). I haven't paid for anything yet, is it too late to get a trades skill? I kind of just want to own a farm at this point.
23 posts omitted
(5 replies)
No.13665885 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Not sure if a /g/ or /sci/ question. Is there any real way to tell if a radio is fcc equipment certified by broadcast alone?
(6 replies)

nootropics/supplements

No.13666231 ViewReplyOriginalReport
are they a meme? Can a human live to 100 or more if he does calorc restriction plus a regimen of nootropics?
Can mental health meds be used as supplements? does mega dosing melatonin and galantime cause drug-trip like effects on dreams?
1 post omitted
(44 replies)
No.13665979 ViewReplyOriginalReport
From eugenics to artificial intelligence: why does Science (as it is interpreted in every age) tend to be a pipeline to racism?

Also, the "nerds" of every field tend to get found out as racists or misogynists trying to keep out inclusive folks every time. Let's not even get started on the fedora bros - the atheists (all Science worshipers). Women and folks of color had to invent an entirely new atheism (atheism plus) to get to enjoy the philosophy.

Why can't science just stop fucking around with folks of color for every just a generation or two?
39 posts and 3 images omitted
(36 replies)

Is the "Reverse Psychology" effect really powerful enough to pull something like this off?

No.13666570 ViewReplyOriginalReport
So I have absolutely been doing exactly this sort of thing in the hopes of killing some trumpfags but I assumed from the start that it was basically ineffectual because >psychology.
Scientifically speaking, how much blood actually is there on my hands and how can I improve my technique to get more?
31 posts and 3 images omitted
(31 replies)
No.13661514 ViewReplyOriginalReport
T-rexes and other carnivorous dinosaurs who are of similar build are either intentionally fake or had been created with great misconceptions with no one ever questioning the biomechanics. Dinosaurs of that build cannot eat healthy four legged herbivores of similar size to them because they would get their asses kicked or gored since they don't have no real defensive or effective offensive mechanisms due to having near useless arms and the fact they have to stick their head out first when wanting to bite or run at full speed (which they can't as admitted by science articles) so they would have to resort to eating animals who are too small to fight back which then would require t-rexes to eat alot of small animals in order to maintain the necessary calorie intake for their bodies to survive which in of itself will be a difficult task since they will have to compete with their own kind (and other carnivores) for those animals in addition those animals can hide or find shelter that t-rexes cannot penetrate or reach. In addition t-rexes would be prey to various carnivores due to their long tail that they need for stabilization and their massive blindspots. By evolution standards these creatures are malaldaptive to the point that they wouldn't be able to live long enough to even reproduce even one generation due to these mentioned factors
26 posts and 1 image omitted