Threads by latest replies - Page 2560

(5 replies)
No.13669679 ViewReplyOriginalReport
How do we fix this mess of a sex?
(5 replies)
(21 replies)

NO FUCKING BULLSHIT

No.13665707 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I want concise, well researched, scientific arguments as to whether this is good or bad for you.

No bullshit out-of-the-ass answers.

Tell me scientifically if this is good or bad for you.
16 posts omitted
(5 replies)
(7 replies)
No.13669407 ViewReplyOriginalReport
How many hours a day do you study?
what is your excuse?
2 posts omitted
(23 replies)
No.13661352 ViewReplyOriginalReport
18 posts omitted
(43 replies)

DNA Inheritance

No.13660783 ViewReplyOriginalReport
If I'm 1/2 Italian and 1/2 German, can my child inherit only my German DNA and none of my Italian?
38 posts and 3 images omitted
(17 replies)

People who don't floss should be denied healthcare.

No.13667897 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Think of how much widespread poor dental hygiene must cost the dental services system. We could save untold money and lives if we just mandated that everyone must floss properly and brush their teeth for a full 2 minutes, twice a day, every day.
Prove me wrong, without using logic that would also apply to vaccine mandates.
12 posts omitted
(5 replies)
No.13668661 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>Dihydrogen monoxide:
>
>is also known as hydroxyl acid, and is the major component of acid rain.
>contributes to the "greenhouse effect".
>may cause severe burns.
>contributes to the erosion of our natural landscape.
>accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals.
>may cause electrical failures and decreased effectiveness of automobile brakes.
>has been found in excised tumors of terminal cancer patients.
>Despite the danger, dihydrogen monoxide is often used:
>
>as an industrial solvent and coolant.
>in nuclear power plants.
>in the production of styrofoam.
>as a fire retardant.
>in many forms of cruel animal research.
>in the distribution of pesticides. Even after washing, produce remains contaminated by this chemical.
>as an additive in certain "junk-foods" and other food products.
(5 replies)

Technology creating technology

No.13667044 ViewReplyOriginalReport
It is nearly impossible to distribute technology from a national office, as other countries will have to understand this as a threat.

It is possible to distribute technology from a global level, as long as a judicial foundation exists, otherwise efforts will be rendered useless as local officials will steal.

That's the current situation: As state officials got threatened with the emergence of a supranational entity, outcompeting their own competencies, they got the flu, martial law and the lockdown got declared.

So as I write this, state officials globally are stealing our all future over some fucking red wine.