Threads by latest replies - Page 2500

(5 replies)
(5 replies)
No.13687829 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Why dont people trust the science?
(5 replies)
No.13687751 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Just curious: how are you guys handling bowel emptying? I haven't shit my pants yet, but every 2-3 days I basically have to rush to the bathroom urgently, and I've definitely had some close calls. It's 10x worse than any enema or suppository I've ever had.
Are you guys taking this on an empty stomach? Are you taking it with any kind of bulking agent?
Some people are apparently using diapers, but I can't bring myself as a grown fucking man to go that route.
(42 replies)
No.13687240 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Are all universities like this?
37 posts and 7 images omitted
(220 replies)

Kurzgesagt says you can't fix climate change

No.13670176 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
I'm glad we got over that.
215 posts and 21 images omitted
(5 replies)
(121 replies)
No.13673193 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>be burnout senior collegefag
>way behind in my physics classes
>start taking adderall
>am able to work round the clock with minimal distractions
Why is this not mandatory?
116 posts and 12 images omitted
(5 replies)
No.13687179 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Hello is there any c++ programmer here? Does Sdl library contain all the features of openGL?
(9 replies)

REDOX SUCKS

No.13683636 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Redox nomenclature is retarded and sucks.

>oxidation involves the loss of electrons
>wtf does OXYGEN have to do with this?

>reduction involves the gaining of an electron
>to reduce means to decrease… but in retarded chemistry it means to gain. LOL!

>a reductor oxidises and an oxidator reduces
>why the fuck doesn’t a REDUCTOR REDUCE and an OXIDATOR OXIDATE

I hate this retarded nomenclature. It’s confusing and sucks. FIX IT!
4 posts omitted
(5 replies)