Threads by latest replies - Page 169

(37 replies)

Interesting problem

No.14383305 ViewReplyOriginalReport
If you have an ellipse, minor and major axis 1/2 and 1 respectively, and the ellipse intersects both the x- and y-axis once each.

Mathematically speaking, what is the largest possible number on the x-axis that the ellipse is able to intersect? The ellipse can be in any angle you want.
32 posts and 4 images omitted
(22 replies)
No.14385058 ViewReplyOriginalReport
(no racebait or IQtards)

why is China's economy, history and present, soo much better on average than the rest of the world? please feel free to leave your analysis on it
17 posts and 2 images omitted
(34 replies)
No.14385597 ViewReplyOriginalReport
can YOU find the area which is painted black?
29 posts and 5 images omitted
(17 replies)

Terrain theory and viruses

No.14384097 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What do you think about the alternative to germ theory and the notion viruses are actually particles produced by the cells themselves as a consequence of certain stress factors
such as drugs and toxins? Let me illustrate why I think this is correct using 2 examples:

1. "If we ask bacteriologists which comes first: the terrain or the bacteria, the answer is always that it is the environment (the terrain) that allows the microbes to thrive. The germs, then, do not directly produce the disease". This is exemplified in the case of the oral cavity's Strep Mutans population increase after introducing grains to our diet:
https://youtu.be/yCPwD59sDvg?t=1020

2. "Practically all of the illnesses that affected people in industrialized countries in the decades before World War II (tuberculosis etc.) ceased to cause problems after 1945. For a few years, the major exception was polio (infantile paralysis), which continues to be called an infectious disease. In the 1950s, the number of polio cases in developed countries fell drastically—and epidemic authorities attributed this success to their vaccination campaigns. But a look at the statistics reveals that the number of polio victims had already fallen drastically when vaccination activities started (see diagram 2)".

"Many pieces of evidence justify the suspicion that the cause of infantile paralysis (polio) is not a virus. Many experts, like American physician Benjamin Sandler, believe a decisive factor is a high consumption of refined foods such as granulated sugar.312 Others cite mass vaccinations. Indeed, since the beginning of the 20th century, it has been known that the paralysis so typical of polio have often appeared at the site where an injection has been given.313 Additionally, the number of polio cases increased drastically after mass vaccinations against diphtheria and whooping cough in the 1940s, as documented in the Lancet and other publications".314 315 316

Excerpt from Virus Mania.
12 posts and 1 image omitted
(24 replies)
No.14384072 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>one: 3 letters
>two: 3 letters
>three: 5 letters
What exactly did they mean by this?
19 posts and 5 images omitted
(23 replies)
No.14385012 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What if they preserve your body and revive it 10000 years later, would that still be you?
What if they preserve your atomic structure and reassemble it using different materials, would that still be you?
What's the difference between the two?
18 posts and 2 images omitted
(5 replies)

Lab world

No.14386858 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What do YOU listen to in the lab?

I've recently started pirating books to listen to. I can easily afford them, but....why should I?
(12 replies)

redpill me on supplements

No.14384887 ViewReplyOriginalReport
are they worth investing in / not a scam for the most part ?
7 posts and 1 image omitted
(5 replies)
No.14386629 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What are the implications of this?
(12 replies)
No.14383414 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Realistically speaking, how likely is it that humans kill all life on this planet this century? With the Cuban Missile crisis and nuclear tensions increasing with the War in Ukraine, and the research of antimatter bombs, it seems like a matter of time before one country invents a weapon so powerful it threatens to eradicate all life on Earth. We don't even know what kind of weapons we'll have in 50 years, possibly something even more powerful.

It doesn't seem like there are enough checks and balances around these technologies, and one bad dictator getting in charge can threaten to undo billions of years of evolution on this planet. And if we somehow make it out of this century, what about the next century? What about the next 1000 years? Can we really expect world peace for that long?
7 posts omitted