>>14386800>Are you every poster on this board? A legitimate question I guess since there are boatloads of bots now. "No".
>>14386856>Wrong.So why use the wire? Why use different materials of wires?
>we do. we've known about electrons for over a hundred years LMAO. we quantified precisely the charge of an electron a century ago.You quantified the weight of an oil drop in an electromagnetic field and called it an "electron". It's a psychosis at best.
>the experiment isn't complicated.It also didn't prove anything whatsoever. It had the conditions set up to reproduce an effect that could be named for a Nobel prize because mathematicians needed an answer in number form. There has never been an actual experiment that proved the existence of an electron particle.
>voltage is a buzzword>stopped reading thereWell I can't stop laughing here after you said that. Also it literally is a buzzword.
>>14386865>the source of the potentialThe potential of what?
> chemical battery, an alternator, or a dynamo. Okay and and how does it do that? Where does the actual energy come from? A generator for instance burns shit and boils water to turn a fucking assemply of magnets and copper. None of that heat, none of the actual matter from that burning is actually being transmuted into this process. None of that is actually in the copper lines. An archform with magnets is turned and out comes electricity: The hertzian waveform. In reality this is basically geomancy but in the sick minds of physicists it's described as magic bumping particles traveling through unmoved dielectrics (somehow because the explanation isn't actually there).
>is "potential energy" a buzzword too?What does it refer to? Something with "potential" I'm assuming? It's basically admission that they don't actually know (but you potentially do, hurr!)
>>14386868>plenty of power lines are fucking bare.The fields they create are their insulation then.