/sci/ - Science & Math

59KiB, 500x500, 3AC440AB-920B-4E25-89B7-B24D5E70895E.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Got the shot, how do i asses the damage?

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 11:48:12 2022 No.14224402 View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By: >>14226492

Caved under pressure from employer and family and got jabbed.
>regret it
>visit 4chan for the first time in a year
>visit /pol/
>realize i’ve corrupted my body
>i will never be clean again
>start panicking

What should i test myself for?
How likely is it that the vax will result in complications? I’m serious. I’m a fucking autist and i can’t let this shit go.

59 posts and 11 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1644618997147.jpg, 58KiB, 750x731

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 23:47:03 No.14226490 Report

Quoted By: >>14226507

>>14226358

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 23:47:25 No.14226492 Report

Quoted By:

>>14224402
If you are fine then nothing will happen.
Relax after the second vax
Relent against the ((big guys and their pets))

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO goal post.jpg, 145KiB, 690x449

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 23:47:58 No.14226494 Report

Quoted By: >>14226509

>>14226445
Here you go

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 23:52:51 No.14226507 Report

Quoted By:

>>14226490
Why you using a nigger meme to shill for China? kek Chinese all niggers now also?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 23:53:57 No.14226509 Report

Quoted By:

>>14226494
Noice! Thanks!
That should rustle some jimmies with the revolts happening in Canada and US cities.

149KiB, 428x450, 1628586094022.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 22:40:11 2022 No.14226259 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14226315 >>14226322

How can a thing be considered a thing if the sense of thingness is different for each person? Who decides the limits and why they?

3 posts and 1 image omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 22:58:26 No.14226315 Report

Quoted By:

>>14226259
>the sense of thingness is different for each person
1. Some intuitive categories are just natural for the human mind, so there's some overlap by default
2. When you interact with others and develop a mutual understanding and a common ground, your concepts synchronize with theirs: you can teach someone the essence of your concept by showing them concrete examples, until they intuitively learn the relevant characteristics are shared between all the examples.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 23:00:19 No.14226322 Report

Quoted By: >>14226348

>>14226259
Objective truth (even for "sense of thingness") exists

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 23:07:07 No.14226348 Report

Quoted By:

>>14226322
This is a bold statement. How have you accessed the totality of all other consciousness' subjective first-person experience? You would need to do this, it would seem, to be justified in making this claim.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 3524344.jpg, 70KiB, 452x363

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 23:08:15 No.14226353 Report

Quoted By: >>14226398

>This is a bold statement. How have you accessed the totality of all other consciousness' subjective first-person experience? You would need to do this, it would seem, to be justified in making this claim.
Hooooooooly cringe.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 23:21:26 No.14226398 Report

Quoted By:

>>14226353
>no answer or evidence to back up the claim
I didn't think so. There is no such thing as objective subjectiveness with regard to sense qualia, obviously. Subjective qualia can not be examined by other minds. Unless you want to make a claim at mind reading but even then you would need to present some evidence for anyone to take you serious.

1MiB, 1516x890, science.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 17:22:09 2022 No.14225181 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14226189 >>14226228 >>14226275

why is science stagnant?

>1920s
a breakthrough every few years
many great and accomplished physicists
experimenting and proving theories.
question everything

>2020s
hype and big headlines
over promise for more funding
let's create a bigger accelerator
this is what a scientist look like
I fucking love science
don't question """science"""

how can we go back, is to too late?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 17:25:36 No.14225190 Report

Quoted By:

People who made those accomplishments got loads of praise.
Well connected upper class people wanted praise, so they buy themselves into those positions.
"Look I'm a scientist now, praise me!!"

Thats it. Its that simple.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 22:22:57 No.14226189 Report

Quoted By:

>>14225181
Scientific knowledge is already complete.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 22:31:59 No.14226228 Report

Quoted By: >>14226330

>>14225181
low hanging fruit
the problems left are hard to solve

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 6.png, 1MiB, 1119x628

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 22:45:05 No.14226275 Report

Quoted By:

>>14225181
>why is science stagnant?
It all leads back to these guys.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 23:02:41 No.14226330 Report

Quoted By:

>>14226228
> everything important was already discovered
I hear that for the past 200 years

1MiB, 3508x2480, Untitled-1 copy.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Neuralink Brain implant will give users orgasms on demand

Anonymous Tue 08 Feb 01:53:01 2022 No.14199680 View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

> The revolutionary device could be implanted in human subjects by the end of this year, and some experts believe it could completely revolutionise human sexuality
>Neurobiologist Professor Andrew Hires said: ”The first application you can imagine is better mental control for a robotic arm for someone who's paralysed."
>But more than one researcher has explored the idea of stimulating the brain’s pleasure centres directly, allowing people to do without drugs or alcohol to achieve pleasurable sensations.
>Dr Stuart Meloy developed a device in 2001 that was playfully dubbed “The Orgasmatron”
>Using Neuralink “the stimulation of pleasure centres could be used to heighten arousal and orgasmic sexual response”, writes sex-tech expert Ben Barnes.
>“If the pleasure responses of another person could be recorded by a chip, then that same pleasure experience could potentially be rewired into their partner, letting them know what their partner’s sexual pleasure feels like."
>Musk has said his company hopes to start implanting its chips in humans in 2022 — two years later than he'd originally promised.
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/tech/news/elon-musks-neuralink-brain-chip-26140419

This is a scientific breakthrough in the total control of our brains. Coomers will be finally satisfied

273 posts and 27 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 20:35:40 No.14225848 Report

Quoted By:

>>14221171
Your brain isn’t a computing device

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 20:37:44 No.14225854 Report

Quoted By:

>>14221158
We decide what gives it pain and pleasure. Like how our brain rewards its visual department for finding patterns.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 22:21:19 No.14226180 Report

Quoted By:

> ITT: Harlan Ellison cultists

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 22:44:31 No.14226273 Report

Quoted By:

Tech=bad
Surrogate Activity=bad
staring at fire for 12 hours while straight eating deer=good

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 22:47:23 No.14226279 Report

Quoted By:

>>14222579
let me explain in simple terms that no one has correctly stated:
science=stupid
tech=degenerate

51KiB, 2560x1771, YouTube_full-color_icon_(2017).svg.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

What Are You Favorite Math/Science Channels /sci/?

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 00:56:27 2022 No.14222944 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14225555

For me its Physics Explained no no other channels can beat it.

15 posts and 6 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 18:57:04 No.14225470 Report

Quoted By:

>>14225467
gave it their all back then I mean

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 19:19:23 No.14225555 Report

Quoted By:

>>14222944
this was fun to watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loCBvaj4eSg

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 21:35:17 No.14226002 Report

Quoted By:

A bunch of universities and professors post lectures and seminars on youtube which is nice.
Currently watching Alex Kontorovich's Analytic Number Theory course and Timothy Gowers' Additive Combinatorics course. Meanwhile Richard Bocherds is cranking out mini series on a bunch of math topics.
Steven Miller's also seem quite fun from the few I've watched.
Frederic Schuller's course on foundational math for physics is a wonderful introduction to manifolds.
Math Curator Zanachan has some nice videos on algebraic topics.
The Bright Side of Mathematics has videos on basic analysis with nice visuals.
Two Minute Papers is interesting to follow some of the developments in AI/ML.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 22:11:21 No.14226140 Report

Quoted By:

>>14224984
very interesting hidden gem

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 22:42:39 No.14226266 Report

Quoted By:

>>14224987
rip
too based for this timeline

9KiB, 257x196, multiplication chart.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Discrete Dynamical System Question

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 21:15:00 2022 No.14225940 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14226229

Hello all. I am a biologist and I have a discrete system I created and I want to force an internal equilibrium to be unstable given conditions on my control variable.

I just want someone to tell me if they agree with my logic. this is what I have done:

To prove stability in a discrete system you usually use the jury conditions:
|TraceJ| < 1 + detJ < 2 . Where J is the Jacobian.

If I show that |TraceJ| > 2, have I shown instability for the equilibrium point in question? I sure hope so, because I spent hours solving for my control variable.

HELP will be taken seriously. So please give your opinion.

13KiB, 657x527, 7.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

is it true that albert einstein was a glorified brainlet?

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 22:14:10 2022 No.14226152 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14226157 >>14226173

195KiB, 1636x430, 2022-02-11-120937_scrot.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 11 Feb 15:10:23 2022 No.14217484 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

i want out

12 posts and 1 image omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1620714026598.png, 166KiB, 608x606

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 11:51:50 No.14224411 Report

Quoted By: >>14225016 >>14225027

>non-degenerate killing form

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 16:01:59 No.14225016 Report

Quoted By:

>>14224411
>>14218429
not even its final form tho

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1634209267193.gif, 2MiB, 480x360

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 16:05:55 No.14225027 Report

Quoted By:

>>14224411

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1628423859443.png, 16KiB, 309x266

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 16:12:59 No.14225039 Report

Quoted By:

>play with woman
>can have gaggle of followers with SMP tits, amors and wigs no problem
>play a man
>have two followers and game freezes for 10 seconds going through every door
I do not understand!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 22:26:22 No.14226202 Report

Quoted By:

>>14221676

Latus rectum

599KiB, 972x1494, fucking-lol.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 17:45:14 2022 No.14225240 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14226153

Scientifically speaking, are saying the n-word and trying to overthrow a government the same thing?

7KiB, 318x159, stationary wave.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

What is a stationary (Qphys)

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 21:11:54 2022 No.14225928 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14226083

Im confused, as the definition in my textbook def. of station wave is
>states of system in which measurable properties of the system do not change with time
To me, that sounds like it would be a linear function and not a wave, which is constantly changing. But they make it seem like it's relatable to standing waves, which make more sense that it is a wave fixed at certain points forming nodes

1 post omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 21:17:01 No.14225952 Report

Quoted By:

you are confusing time derivatives with slope

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 21:19:09 No.14225956 Report

Quoted By: >>14226012

>>14225939
so are you saying that only points of the wave are stationary, as compared to the whole wave being stationary?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 21:39:18 No.14226012 Report

Quoted By:

>>14225956
STATIONARY POINTS are any point whose derivative is 0
STANDING WAVES are functions u(x,t) that 1) satisfy the partial differential equation $<br />u_{tt}=c^2u_{xx}$ and 2) have nodes (points on the wave with zero amplitude at all times, and which do not move)
idk what a """stationary wave""" is

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 21:53:47 No.14226083 Report

Quoted By: >>14226137

>>14225928
$\psi (t,x) = e^{i \omega t} u (x)$
$P (t,x) = | \psi (t,x) |^2 = | u (x) |^2 = P (x)$

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 2022 22:11:12 No.14226137 Report

Quoted By:

>>14226083
This. The wavefunction is not constant, but the amplitude is, as are observables.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Threads by latest replies - Page 750

Your latest searches

Got the shot, how do i asses the damage?

Neuralink Brain implant will give users orgasms on demand

What Are You Favorite Math/Science Channels /sci/?

Discrete Dynamical System Question

is it true that albert einstein was a glorified brainlet?

What is a stationary (Qphys)