It's been awhile, but back before COVID, the other thing sci used to discuss was radio technology and other electronics that rely on EM radiation outside of the visible spectrum.

The general consensus amongst the IFLS types and the pro-censorship redditors on this board, is that all forms of radio and cell technology are perfectly safe, that this is "settled science", and that anyone who is concerned about cell phones or communication towers or 5G or anything like that is just a far-right conspiracy theorist who should be censored. But if that's the case, then why are government organizations and an entire global community of hundreds of scientists actively researching the safety of radio and cell technology, and the environmental and public healthy consequences of EM radiation? In what sense is the science settled? I'm not even someone who's very concerned about stuff like 5G or anything. Like if I found out tomorrow that 5G is carcinogenic, it would have no impact on my behavior or lifestyle. Nevertheless, I think it's a perfectly legitimate and interesting and valuable scientific question to ask whether 5G has any negative health effects, and intuitively I would not be surprised if, e.g. it was found to be carcinogenic.

I just don't get how all the scientifically illiterate normies on this board feel so confident in shitting on everyone else, and constantly labeling anyone who disagrees with them as a conspiracy theorist whether in be in the context of 5G or vaccines. I mean, there is literally an entire subject called RADIOBIOLOGY devoted to the study of how EM radiation impacts living organisms and systems, so the idea that a new EM technology like 5G could be hazardous is not some crazy conspiracy theory. Again, this is not an important issue to me, and I don't have a serious concerns about 5G, but all I'm saying is that is could have health consequences that we're not aware off, and that's not an outlandish "conspiracy theory".

When I was 10 I learned this riddle and I still haven't solved it - I have a mental block about it.
Can someone solve it for me, it's probably quite easy:
>a hen and a half lays an egg and a half every day and a half
>how many eggs do six hens lay in seven days?
also, post other such similar riddles please

I just read the Adam and Eve story by Chan Thomas (link below) and in it is a reference to a research paper that made the front page of the Los Angeles Times in 1968. This study placed mice in an environment with the same EMF levels as the half-way point between the earth and moon (L1). The lack of magnetic energy produced criminal behavior: cannibalism and forced rape which occurred on a daily basis. I've been looking for this study and have not been able to find it. This interests me as crime has increased lately and recently the solar system's position in the galaxy is approaching a change in the EMF.

It was from the Hahnemann Medical College. If anyone has a link to this I would appreciate it. I've got a subscription to newspapers.com and nothing comes up. I don't believe Mr. Thomas would make this up, so I suspect it has been deleted. If you've read this book (or the Bible) you understand that before a great flood/catastrophe comes a great moral decay.

https://archive.org/details/ChanThomasTheAdamAndEveStoryTheHistoryOfCataclysms1993FullUNCENSORED

>what do you call someone who reads a category theory paper?
>a co-author

i am constantly striken between

>man i should make academia my life and try to go to that elite university

and

>fuck i don't care about all of this i just want to be loved, i hate getting older without having had a gf as a teenager

Do quantfags unironically think you can predict the market with mere mathematics?

hello brothers, so my long term goal is to study physics, where I've always been an ignorant. stuff like relativity, cosmology, astrophysics, etc. is particularly interesting to me, but it seems you can't really attempt any of that without learning things like calculus.
so I've been doing that, almost done with MIT OCW 18.01 now. it's coming along nicely
so my question: does it pay to do 18.02, 18.03 right away too (multivariable calculus, differential equations), or can you jump straight into the physics stuff and be sort of fine?
and is linear algebra a hard prereq too?

Where does the time constant go?
t is the input parameter (time)
u(t) is the Heaviside step function
x(t) is the input
and y(t) is the output
What do I do to make the output have the time constant tau?

There's no way these things are real

Is there any point to getting a PhD if you don't want to be a professor?