>>14288165I'll summarize this thread:
Me: the historical importance of vaccines is drastically overstated
You:
>No it's not! Vaccines are perfect and amazing!Well here's data that shows most infectious diseases were already reduced by roughly 90% from their turn of the century highs before vaccines came out
>But what about this one spike in polio???Good counter evidence, but that's one disease in one decade. What else do you have?
>You're a liar!What? I'm asking for more evidence.
>No, that's not what the thread is about!Uh, yeah it is dude, reread the OP.
>No, you're lying and I proved you wrong anyway.No, you offered a little evidence. Do you have more? Here's some more evidence for my claim.
>You haven't offered any evidence! You're a hateful anti vaxxer!Again, I've given you plenty of data. Here it is again.
>Where is it?? No you haven't!!It's right here. For the third time.
>You hate science! You're a bad person! How dare you say anything bad about vaccines!Lol, you're a fag dude.
