Scientifically speaking can weebs be considered human?

Why isn't more scientifically valid the concept that some ayy lmao race genetically engineered some hominid race to be smart, which basically these genetically modified hominids would eventually learn basic civilizational shit from them and they worship as God's, eventually leaving at some point for some reason and these tales from magical beings became the basic of most religious writings about Jehova and magic?

Woudn't that easily explains most religions?

And wouldn't also developing a religious/magic belief/schizo gene to make most humans dociles npcs and followers a good trait to develop for a slave kind of dog race we could also engineer for some reason?

Wouldn't that explain most /x/ ancient mythology/religion/magic shit?

What is the point of turning a sphere inside out? Are mathematicians just too focused on the theoretical and not the practical?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv-XNlE1s8E

conciousness is transfer of matter>energy between working systems

Proof
> no eat not concious
> no drink no concious
> no light no concious

Explain why im wrong

post in this thread if you agree that science is for gay faggots

/sci/ meme thread

You're pretty smart, anons, can you help me with a plane? I'm moving the FLAP lever as hard as I can but the wings still aren't flapping. Is the plane broken?

Using the power of computers, how do I become a master of mathematics in 18 months?

how should i define the orientation and position of one limb relative to another in a locomotion gait maybe based on its multibody dynamics
like assuring the spine and abdomen rotates enough (but not too much) towards the dominant stepping legs and does the counterrotation as much during the other step and maybe assuring symmetry between the two swing of arms so that either ones goes the same distance

but generally its about knowing a loop that is consistent, repeats properly but also dynamicaybe using variable modeling