Threads by latest replies - Page 3607
Anonymous (10 replies)
Thoughts on this?
I just finished it and I wish I had discovered this during college.
Also, what the fuck is "deep work"? It seems to me like he defines it as a very focused state, instead of just not distracting with your phone or dicking around 4chan while you work. So how do I know if I'm doing "deep work" or just non-painfully-distracted "shallow work".
Btw he was an absolute QT when he was younger.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13335432 >So how do I know if I'm doing "deep work" or just non-painfully-distracted "shallow work". try mindfulness meditation and you understand what it feels like
Anonymous
>>13335432 You don't need the whole book, or any of all of his books really they're like 20% content and the rest basically anecdotal filler but people like reading biography filler of other scientists/writers I guess
"Deep work" just means you do what he used to do, he would after class go to the most abandoned library on campus, find a corner and work for a few hours going over every equation or concept presented in class and prove it himself. tl;dr no distractions, working by yourself, and putting in serious thought to the problems.
"Shallow work" is when you see those kids in the student union building or cafeteria/food court just hanging around pseudo studying mainly looking at their phones to 'being social'. They have books all around them but aren't really doing anything.
btw I followed Newport's blog from when he was a Freshman to MIT grad school to now a tenured professor. Most of his advice I had figured out myself and most people naturally do what he does which is schedule time to work, and actually work.
Anonymous
>>13336462 >You don't need the whole book, or any of all of his books really they're like 20% content and the rest basically anecdotal filler I agree but it makes it easier to remember and easier/nicer to read than if it was just a checklist.
Can you share that blog with me please?
Anonymous
>>13336506 >Can you share that blog with me please? Nevermind,
calnewport.com of course
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13336509 If you go into the archive it literally goes back to his freshman year, here's a post from his second year:
https://www.calnewport.com/blog/2008/11/25/case-study-how-i-got-the-highest-grade-in-my-discrete-math-class/ tl'dr
- find quiet workspace
- turn off distractions
- take every proof given in lecture and replicate by proving it yourself
- repeat
- get highest grade, no cram studying needed before final
Anonymous (144 replies)
Why? Why are experimental vaccines released to young people. No long term studies of these vaccines exist. What happens when some new variant like the delta variant comes along that is a lot more deadly to the vaccinated. What happens when new vaccines more effective are developed and are incompatible with the current vaccine.
How is this mass child abuse going through?
Young healthy humans who still have their whole life in front of them are being abused as guinea pigs for big pharma.
Anonymous
>>13315512 >experimental vaccines They're not experimental
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13335751 mention at least 5 mrna vaccines that have been in the market at least 10 years.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
what's the counter incentive for a medical company not to release a virus that they control the vaccine or treatment for?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
part of all this is to gain societal acceptance for the rapid deployment of pharmacological interventions on the wider public. it's not just about a vaccine, it's about precedent and medical culture. you can think of it as like liberalization of the pharmaceutical sector. the trouble with the current situation is that this deregulation of pharma is simultaneously coinciding with ever more intrusive policies, like health certificates. i think unless people take a harder stance now, you will see a lot of drugs/vaccines/medical devices on the market because their deployment will be fast tracked. safety will always be at your own risk and the time scales of finding out if something truly works or not will make it so that only future generations can benefit. that may result in breakthroughs, but it could also harm many people.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13315512 Work on these vaccines started 15 years ago when SARS COV-1 hit but were halted when SARS COV-1 didn't spread outside of Asia. Furthermore work on Coronavirus vaccines goes back decades but could never get sufficient funding because the worst Coronaviruses were the common cold. You guys act like nobody knows what they're doing and these vaccines were created by morons.
Anonymous (52 replies)
>David Sinclair tells Joe Brogan in a recent interview that they were probably born a generation or two too early for LEV
>Aubrey de Grey is essentially a high-functioning alcoholic--is this how a person who thought LEV was around the corner would behave?
I'm 36, KHV, NEET, and due to autism, anxiety, childhood obesity, and circumcision, I feel like I missed out on so many essential human experiences of 18-30, the prospect of life extension and anti-aging are one of the few things that keeps me going.
Cryonics is still a possibility, but it seems like such a longshot.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13330925 >Too many young students get involved in deep research that could envelop their entire career for the betterment of mankind >they should all just be snakeoil salesman and prophets! kek
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13333270 Dumbass, the human body is not a closed system.
Anonymous
>I'm 36, KHV, NEET, and due to autism, anxiety, childhood obesity, and circumcision, I feel like I missed out on so many essential human experiences of 18-30, SO WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU WANT TO PROLONG YOUR LIFE IF YOU"RE SUCH A GODDAMN LOSER DUE TO THE CHOICES YOU MADE AND NOTHING BUT? IF ANYTHING, YOU SHOULD WANT TO KILL YOURSELF, NOT EXTEND YOUR PATHETIC EXISTENCE
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13335314 >SO WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU WANT TO PROLONG YOUR LIFE IF YOU"RE SUCH A GODDAMN LOSER DUE TO THE CHOICES YOU MADE AND NOTHING BUT? IF ANYTHING, YOU SHOULD WANT TO KILL YOURSELF, NOT EXTEND YOUR PATHETIC EXISTENCE I didn't choose to be autistic, have anxiety, and be genitally mutilated
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13333404 >Just get rich by retard. 40 is the new 30, if you are a man and successful. You could still slay pussy or live the "young" lifestyle >Just get rich bro :^) I'm working on it, but the anxiety creeps up on me.
I have a physical exam coming up, after not having had one in years. I haven't had a lipid panel, a1c, etc. since I was 20.
I have a healthy diet and "healthy" BMI (some flab), and I've been exercising heavily, so I'm hoping for the best.
But the "what if I have high cholesterol," etc. anxiety creeps up on me.
Anyway, there's always cryonics.
Anonymous (35 replies)
How can I retain the most/study the most effectively using a textbook?
What I'm currently doing is writing things I think are important in a separate notebook, not as a reference further on but rather as a means of augmenting my retention. I used to also highlight/underline, but I've come to find that that's a waste of time and is pointless, as marking something I already know won't do anything, while noting it down might.
However, I feel like writing things down as much as I do is terribly inefficient (waste of time, could go through a textbook way faster without) and doesn't actually accomplish better retention, as once I've read something it's usually in my head (can't always recall it immediately though). And my notes are pretty redundant, so I probably just suck at it too (OCD, want to write down everything).
What do? How do you study? General studying tips welcome too (especially Math and Comp Sci).
Anonymous
>>13335818 arent you people wary of sharing your methods and that people are starting to do the same as you? dont you worry about competition?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13335134 I'd agree with you if people not punctuating didn't irritate me as much as them not capitalizing.
Anonymous
>>13335824 I guess we're not selfish people anon.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13336450 why not? i really want to stop being a selfish asshole but i see it as a survival necessity
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13334004 I do something similar to this guy
>>13334045 I read the chapter and take notes of the concepts the author is trying to get across
Then I recite the concepts to an invisible audience and if I can't effortlessly do so I re-read it again
If there are exercises I'll try a few samples but not drill them all it's a waste of time, most of the time I make my own exercises
I will also model everything. Since you're doing math/cs if you're doing a stat book you can take every single stats function and write it yourself, build your own custom stats library. You wouldn't ever use it except as a toy for learning but it will demystify many of the silly functions where it's just e with a billion parameters. After a while you will even be able to cut down most of the functions and make them more abstract, distilling the essence of statistical functions. Can also do this for CS, say there is some distributed protocol you're learning well write your own toy version to help you understand the real one.
For things like algorithms you just drill yourself using competitive programming sites like Kattis it's the easiest way to remember the design of a dozen logarithmic time data structures.
Anonymous (5 replies)
How does one achieve this
Anonymous (5 replies)
Is scat play scientifically safe
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Urin = yes. Shit = no, not safe.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13336414 You cant buy taste!
Can you?
Anonymous (7 replies)
I remember back in undergrad — in my first meta math course (the Godel one) — my prof was finishing up teaching the idea of successors and proved the rather surprising and not-at-all obvious fact that 2 + 2 = 4. Then I realized a thought that I still can’t quite articulate, but goes something like this: isn’t it surprising that the basic rules of inference and math are the same EVERY TIME? It suggests that there is a structure to logic itself.
What maintains that structure? Is it like the characters in Plato’s cave casting shadows on the wall? How is the information in that underlying structure stored, like a big, cosmic, fundamental spreadsheet?
And is conscious necessary for this? If so, it’s interesting and not-at-all an accident that we all agree on what the ‘rules’ or logic are.
Anonymous
>>13334849 Abstract things like logic and mathematics are not physical and therefore don't need to abide by the physical laws. They don't need to be stored anywhere, they can simply exist. They don't need to maintain structure, since the abstract world is likely unchanging. Consciousness is philosophical mumbo-jumbo and not relevant to any of this.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13335256 Never read a more nonsensical post in my whole life.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13334860 this is literally true
all argumentation is a competition between men
if society was ruled by women nothing like this would be permitted to exist
Anonymous
>>13334849 >my prof was finishing up teaching the idea of successors and proved the rather surprising and not-at-all obvious fact that 2 + 2 = 4. Then I realized a thought that I still can’t quite articulate, but goes something like this: isn’t it surprising that the basic rules of inference and math are the same EVERY TIME? It suggests that there is a structure to logic itself. >What maintains that structure? Is it like the characters in Plato’s cave casting shadows on the wall? How is the information in that underlying structure stored, like a big, cosmic, fundamental spreadsheet? >And is conscious necessary for this? If so, it’s interesting and not-at-all an accident that we all agree on what the ‘rules’ or logic are. you will like this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G7wQK2TP7A Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13336281 >you will like this video It was shit.
Anonymous (7 replies)
What’s the latest scientific consensus on red wine? Does it have any health benefits or not?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13334138 it's okay. just don't listen to the anti-alcohol faggots that seem to be overpopulating this board. they're religious nutjobs. most things that humans do aren't really perfectly optimized for longevity but in moderation they aight
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13335189 >alcohol inside is not the healthy part Brainlet take
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13334138 >What’s the latest scientific consensus on red wine? >Science says whats good and whats bad >Despite conflicting studies and research that contradicts itself every other month. >Trust the science, take the vac. >You don't want to kill your grandma. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13334138 Reduces stress.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Alcohol is a cytotoxin, so of course it's bad for your health. It injures the liver, causes dementia and many forms of cancer (eg esophagus, oral cavity, intestine) and reduces fertility.
Anonymous (21 replies)
Found these documents over at an abandoned government building. Trying to figure out what the fuck these ingredients are for. You guys got any ideas?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13336104 There's a some overlap between fertilizer and explosives. Either way, I want to know why they needed a ton of gel for each trial.
Anonymous
nitric acid and all the AN is a dead giveaway for explosives of some kind.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13336214 aluminum is also used as a sensitizer for explosives
Anonymous
>>13331849 I don't know, these seen like some basic biology stuff. I have almost all of these things in my lab. It could be media for plant or bacteria, or it could be some organic chemistry project. THough i see no alkenes or alkins, so idk...
>>13336096 >>13336104 Dude, chill. Lots of things have nitrate groups. Explosives do, a bunch of biomolecules do, a lot of medicines do... Saying "it has nitrate so it is an explosive" is like saying it has carbon so it's fuel. Lots of things have carbon too.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13336236 YOU"RE RIGHT BRO. ETHANOLAMINE AND NITRIC ACID IN A FUCKING PLANT GROWTH MEDIUM. THAT"S WHAT YOU PUT IN THERE IF YOU WANT PLANTS TO GROW. NO POTASSIUM, NO M&S SALTS, JUST A TON OF FUCKING NITRATE LMAO
>ANFO (or AN/FO, for ammonium nitrate/fuel oil) is a widely used bulk industrial explosive. Its name is commonly pronounced as "ANN-foe".[1] >It consists of 94% porous prilled ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) (AN), which acts as the oxidizing agent and absorbent for the fuel, and 6% number 2 fuel oil (FO).[2] THE ONE-TONNE OF NITRATES WOULD BE THE "AN"
THE PARRAFIN WOULD BE THE "FO"
THOSE MIXED TOGETHER WOULD BE "ANFO"
MY DUDE
Anonymous (5 replies)
How tf do fungi like these evolve?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Pathogens aren't restricted to Kingdom Fungi dumbass.
Anonymous
same way everything evolves. a great big long series of random mutations.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>13336296 what a nice cope. how did consciousness evolve?