Threads by latest replies - Page 3392
(5 replies)
(51 replies)
>everyone speaks using netspeak (e.g. BAP, Curse of High IQ)
>suddenly redditfags come
>after all this time they still use the same lexicon and sentence structure
Is it some conviction that our way of speaking is inferior, or what? Wouldn't it make sense to adopt the language of the community that you are a part of?
>suddenly redditfags come
>after all this time they still use the same lexicon and sentence structure
Is it some conviction that our way of speaking is inferior, or what? Wouldn't it make sense to adopt the language of the community that you are a part of?
(5 replies)
Experimental Explosion off Florida Coast
No.13399448 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>13399680 >>13400048
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000emme/executive
https://www.the-sun.com/news/3125001/us-navy-detonates-40000lb-bomb-carrier-triggering-earthquake-florida/
Why? Didn't they just do this a month ago and brought a god damned building down with this shit? Why do it again? And would a mere 40,000 lbs. of TNT create such a powerful earthquake when it's not coupled to the ocean bedrock? Does this make any sense at all? Their last shock test didn't create any quake afaik.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/3125001/us-navy-detonates-40000lb-bomb-carrier-triggering-earthquake-florida/
Why? Didn't they just do this a month ago and brought a god damned building down with this shit? Why do it again? And would a mere 40,000 lbs. of TNT create such a powerful earthquake when it's not coupled to the ocean bedrock? Does this make any sense at all? Their last shock test didn't create any quake afaik.
(5 replies)
How does /sci/ deal with communcation gap resulting from high IQ? I find it impossible to convey my thoughts to """people""" below 115, which is most of """humans"""
(13 replies)
U.S. Sinks Russian Missile Sub
No.13399566 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>13399884 >>13399994 >>13400025
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000emme/executive
At 1:48pm Eastern Daylight Time on July 16, 2021, the U.S. Navy detonated a 40,000 lbs. (TNT Equivalent) explosive in the Atlantic Ocean, 100 miles off Florida’s Atlantic coast. The presumed reason for the detonation was a second “shock test” of the U.S.S. Gerald Ford (CVN-78) in a period of only a month, with a previous test occurring on June 18, 2021.
Performing two shock tests on the same aircraft carrier a month apart is unprecedented, particularly for a ship that has already completed its shakedown and which has been commissioned for 4 years.
There is an alternative explanation for the repeated “tests” that is much more satisfying and has the benefit of being correct.
Firstly, an explosive detonated in the water, be it free-floating or resting on the ocean floor would not be considered “coupled to the bedrock” and would not be able to translate substantial vibrational energy to seismometers on land. In order for this to occur, explosives would have to be buried deep in the ocean floor by a combination of drilling equipment and robotic U.S. Navy mini-subs capable of delivering explosives to those depths.
It is a known fact that both Russia and China routinely deploy ballistic missile submarines to both the U.S. East and West coasts as part of their strategic nuclear deployment. 100 miles off the coast is firmly within international waters. It is also known that ballistic missile subs will “park” by either entering overhangs made of rock formations that shield the ships from active SONAR detection or by coming to rest on the ocean floor directly, gently putting down in small, naturally-occurring valleys on the ocean floor.
At 1:48pm Eastern Daylight Time on July 16, 2021, the U.S. Navy detonated a 40,000 lbs. (TNT Equivalent) explosive in the Atlantic Ocean, 100 miles off Florida’s Atlantic coast. The presumed reason for the detonation was a second “shock test” of the U.S.S. Gerald Ford (CVN-78) in a period of only a month, with a previous test occurring on June 18, 2021.
Performing two shock tests on the same aircraft carrier a month apart is unprecedented, particularly for a ship that has already completed its shakedown and which has been commissioned for 4 years.
There is an alternative explanation for the repeated “tests” that is much more satisfying and has the benefit of being correct.
Firstly, an explosive detonated in the water, be it free-floating or resting on the ocean floor would not be considered “coupled to the bedrock” and would not be able to translate substantial vibrational energy to seismometers on land. In order for this to occur, explosives would have to be buried deep in the ocean floor by a combination of drilling equipment and robotic U.S. Navy mini-subs capable of delivering explosives to those depths.
It is a known fact that both Russia and China routinely deploy ballistic missile submarines to both the U.S. East and West coasts as part of their strategic nuclear deployment. 100 miles off the coast is firmly within international waters. It is also known that ballistic missile subs will “park” by either entering overhangs made of rock formations that shield the ships from active SONAR detection or by coming to rest on the ocean floor directly, gently putting down in small, naturally-occurring valleys on the ocean floor.
(5 replies)
I just want to thank pic. related for taking the vaccine so I don't have to.
(51 replies)
What I in for it, bros? I take 50mg a day.
(5 replies)
are neutral mutations indirectly subject to natural selection? like suppose there is a population of critters with a silent mutation but they also have something deleterious on their genome too while the other critters don't. doesn't that mean natural selection will get rid of or at least dwindle the silent mutation too?
(94 replies)
Vaccinated people are a bunch of cowards.
No.13387847 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Quoted By: >>13399073 >>13399174 >>13400021
Why are vaccinated people so afraid of unvaccinated people? Are they not strong enough to resist COVID, now that they got their vaccine?
(5 replies)
I can grasp concepts within my undergrad engineering mathematics courses
But fail to get an exceptional score on the basis of blunders…
eg.
> see 3 and 4 together and auto covert it to 12 in the next line of working out
> see 3 and 2 together in brackets and convert it to 9 in the subsequent workings out irrespective of function
How can I fix this? Its the most persistent problem I face at uni
But fail to get an exceptional score on the basis of blunders…
eg.
> see 3 and 4 together and auto covert it to 12 in the next line of working out
> see 3 and 2 together in brackets and convert it to 9 in the subsequent workings out irrespective of function
How can I fix this? Its the most persistent problem I face at uni
