Threads by latest replies - Page 2569

(14 replies)

air purifiers

No.13665343 ViewReplyOriginalReport
what's the /sci/ consensus on these? what about the ones that produce ozone? do I need one if I'm a cityfag?
9 posts and 1 image omitted
(5 replies)

The modern age of manipulation and addiction to emotional reactions

No.13662899 ViewReplyOriginalReport
When film and media first came out it was a real endeavor in artistic expression and sincerity. But over the decades, patterns started to be recognized and soulless people turned it into an algorithm to garner the desired reactions in people. The march of progress in this universe is very peculiar and it seems we've reached a precipice of expression. Everything has been done before and it has been catalogued in film and tv leaving nothing but redundancy. Everything being churned out at this point is stale passionless uninspired bile. Where do things go from here? Is it possible for expression to ever be genuine ever again?
(36 replies)
No.13655178 ViewReplyOriginalReport
How to induce longer, more colorful dreams? I don't care about better rest, I just want more dream phases.
31 posts and 2 images omitted
(5 replies)

computability

No.13662159 ViewReplyOriginalReport
From what I understand, a turing machine or a automata is supposed to decide or recognize a language, which generated by a grammar. If computers are turing machines then what are languages? How concepts like recognize or decide can be translated to real life?
(26 replies)
No.13657585 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Am I retarded? WTF is this.... fucked up my first quantum mechanics HW... and I was looking at the answers the professor posted Im pretty sure this goes against everything I've learned in QP and HS calculus.... I was always told that the operator should NEVER be applied to the conjugate term.... and also you cant split up a second derivative like that can you???
21 posts and 1 image omitted
(5 replies)
(5 replies)
No.13665232 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>scientific racism
(5 replies)
No.13665593 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Say there is a cube of whatever substance.
All the particles that this cube consists of are held magically in a completely immobile state relative to the cube's form.
This means that the cube's temperature is at absolute zero.

But here's the question:
Will the cube feel cold to the touch, as its particles are incapable of receiving kinetic energy from their surroundings?
(15 replies)
No.13658691 ViewReplyOriginalReport
How are pure math majors looked upon here?
10 posts omitted
(10 replies)
No.13664412 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I- oh, fuck. God-pilled +1.
5 posts and 3 images omitted