New stonetoss
Threads by latest replies - Page 2353
(10 replies)
(14 replies)
Feels like everyone has become a medical expert over the last 12 months, is this proof of the dunning-kruger effect?
(33 replies)
What is the biological purpose of 'love' other than for procreation?
(5 replies)
Nobody ever talks about proof they exist.
Rock Hudson, Freddy Mercury, the Brady Bunch dad, Eazy-E all drop dead from AIDS. Now nobody drops dead from AIDS.
90/10 males to females get HIV / AIDS in America. 50 / 50 male female get HIV / AIDS in Africa.
Rock Hudson, Freddy Mercury, the Brady Bunch dad, Eazy-E all drop dead from AIDS. Now nobody drops dead from AIDS.
90/10 males to females get HIV / AIDS in America. 50 / 50 male female get HIV / AIDS in Africa.
(8 replies)
What are the vaccines made of? Can I make 'em at home?
(5 replies)
/sci/ Chads, am i going to die ?
No.13732743 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>13732863 >>13733001
I took last night 900mg of Tramadol, at once, the max dose is 400mg but taken over an entire day, at my dose the risks of passing out was high but fortunatly it was just pleasant i felt good and all
but today i feel so fucking tired and my eyes struggle to focus on things, did i fuck up something in me ? or is it just temporary ? thanks
but today i feel so fucking tired and my eyes struggle to focus on things, did i fuck up something in me ? or is it just temporary ? thanks
(6 replies)
When did this get dropped from the four fundamental forces? I just found this out and it's kind of upsetting me. I thought we've understood gravity even more now in the past 20 years now, so what happened? Does the effect of gravity work faster than the speed of light?
(30 replies)
checkmate, physicists
(5 replies)
Hello
I have been told to look up guan rong chen and tetsushi ueta chaos equation. I have also bene told to look up the calculations and characterizations of the equilibrium. But I can not find it anywhere on the web. Does anyone know where I can find it? Thansk in advance.
I have been told to look up guan rong chen and tetsushi ueta chaos equation. I have also bene told to look up the calculations and characterizations of the equilibrium. But I can not find it anywhere on the web. Does anyone know where I can find it? Thansk in advance.
(54 replies)
Now that the dust has settled.
Let us refine the thought experiment a bit for new midwits joining in:
>Imagine you have two billiard balls.
>One billiard ball in an isolated system has a known initial momentum.
>A second billiard ball is placed on a collision course with the first.
>The second ball is stationary relative to the first billiard ball.
>For the exact placement of the second ball, we use a TRNG.
>Therefore we now have a stochastic variable in the contact angle of collision.
>However, the conservation laws still apply, including conservation of momentum.
>Therefore, after the collision, we can measure the momentum of one billiard ball and deduce the momentum of the other by subtracting from the total momentum.
That is ALL that quantum entanglement is, a measurement of quantum variables subject to conservation laws (and yes; it is known to decay in the same way our billiard balls would if the system was not isolated). It is relatively intuitive and uninteresting as far as the realm of quantum mechanics, or mechanics in general for that matter, is concerned. Yet a large amount of grant money has been wasted on extravagant experiments to "prove" that this phenomenon in costly experiments. It is time we pen a letter to Nature end this borderline criminal scam.
Other: A derivation of Bell's Theorem using purely classical laws, from the previous thread:
https://www.sigintsys.com/src/Bell_Prob.pdf
For more background on classical entanglement and the quantum locality issue cf.
>Andrei Khrennikov (2020) Quantum Versus Classical Entanglement: Eliminating the Issue of Quantum Nonlocality, Foundations of Physics volume 50, pages1762–1780
Let us refine the thought experiment a bit for new midwits joining in:
>Imagine you have two billiard balls.
>One billiard ball in an isolated system has a known initial momentum.
>A second billiard ball is placed on a collision course with the first.
>The second ball is stationary relative to the first billiard ball.
>For the exact placement of the second ball, we use a TRNG.
>Therefore we now have a stochastic variable in the contact angle of collision.
>However, the conservation laws still apply, including conservation of momentum.
>Therefore, after the collision, we can measure the momentum of one billiard ball and deduce the momentum of the other by subtracting from the total momentum.
That is ALL that quantum entanglement is, a measurement of quantum variables subject to conservation laws (and yes; it is known to decay in the same way our billiard balls would if the system was not isolated). It is relatively intuitive and uninteresting as far as the realm of quantum mechanics, or mechanics in general for that matter, is concerned. Yet a large amount of grant money has been wasted on extravagant experiments to "prove" that this phenomenon in costly experiments. It is time we pen a letter to Nature end this borderline criminal scam.
Other: A derivation of Bell's Theorem using purely classical laws, from the previous thread:
https://www.sigintsys.com/src/Bell_Prob.pdf
For more background on classical entanglement and the quantum locality issue cf.
>Andrei Khrennikov (2020) Quantum Versus Classical Entanglement: Eliminating the Issue of Quantum Nonlocality, Foundations of Physics volume 50, pages1762–1780
