Threads by latest replies - Page 2325

(5 replies)
No.13741861 ViewReplyOriginalReport
after having read about stuff like phage therapy and those nutters who are setting up their own DIY CRISPR labs, I'm really surprised we've yet to experience some rogue, misanthropic biologist who's focused on designing viruses or bacteria to wipe out the planet. with the internet, it's not hard to be somewhat-acquainted with basic recombinant DNA techniques, and lots of necessary equipment is easily purchaseable for consumers nowadays.
realistically, it does seems feasible with relatively limited resources. so why aren't we seeing these independent bioterrorists pop up? the means are only getting simpler every day.
(5 replies)
No.13741817 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Are all particles actually the same type of particle just performing a different action?
(19 replies)
No.13740634 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Why are we wasting money on researching this shit if it's already expected to cost more than the power we already have?
14 posts and 6 images omitted
(20 replies)
No.13738852 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>double amputee
>cant use left/right hand rule
is there any alternative I could do with my feet?
15 posts and 5 images omitted
(12 replies)

Cooking with women

No.13741233 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>cooking with a woman
>asks me to cut potatoes into cubes
>ask her what size?
>cube size
>mfw
7 posts and 2 images omitted
(25 replies)
No.13741440 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Can some math person actually explain to me what common core is and how it works?
Suppose you have the following:
>45-15=x
Now the way I'm familiar with it, it would be simple
>45-5=40
>40-10=30
>x=30
Or even
>45-15=x
>Obviously it's fucking 30
>x=30
Why would you do it any other way?
20 posts and 1 image omitted
(5 replies)
No.13741502 ViewReplyOriginalReport
2021... I am... forgotten
(7 replies)

Rectifying 2 different ways to look at work

No.13738479 ViewReplyOriginalReport
So I got this problem for physics, and it seems to equal wither 0 or w*L*sin(theta) depending on your approach.
My approach is that work is basically the energy you put into an object - so basically change in energy. Thus, moving the block higher would simply equal m*g*delta(h), which in this problem is w*L*sin(theta). The way this problem looks at it is that W=F dotted with D. In which case, the work done by the force is F*L, and the work done by gravity is negative w*sin(theta)*L. Since the speed is constant, the Fnet = 0, and F = w*sin(theta). Thus Wnet also equals 0. Both approaches seem to be logically consistent. Appreciate any help, thanks.
2 posts and 1 image omitted
(321 replies)

/mg/ - Mathematics General

No.13723081 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Talk about mathematics, last thread was >>13705455
316 posts and 30 images omitted
(10 replies)
No.13740128 ViewReplyOriginalReport
have you ever used the focus and directrix of a parabola for anything /sci/ ?
5 posts and 2 images omitted