Threads by latest replies - Page 2293

(5 replies)
(35 replies)

Femininity or androgyny for peak intelligence?

No.13745846 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Masculinity is helpful for short term and emergency situations but in the long term, to build a civilization you need more feminine or androgynous people who will play along and have high impulse control. The problem here is which is better, femininity or androgyny? Femininity seems like the opposite of masculinity but sadly it's still emotionally bound like masculinity so it explains why most females have average IQ and few outliners unlike males who are all over the place. Perhaps androgyny is nullification of both sides and thus best for peak intelligence of the human race? Though it might look like that because androgyny is still more assertive than femininity and thus we don't really acknowledge the long term results of femininity that require better settings for it to start working better. Pic related is supposed to be an intellectual skull shape, that's why I picked it.
30 posts and 3 images omitted
(18 replies)
No.13748544 ViewReplyOriginalReport
The smartest thing anyone could ever do is laugh.
13 posts and 4 images omitted
(5 replies)
No.13749515 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I'm getting a lot of varying information on whether MRIs can determine if you have depression or not. I had one a few days ago. I have not been properly diagnosed with depression and got the MRI for a separate issue. I was hoping I could get an answer when I received the scans.
(30 replies)
No.13749606 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>shit at mental arithmetic
>great at programming, logic, and problem solving

Someone explain this. Am I retarded.
25 posts and 4 images omitted
(35 replies)

epicurean paradox

No.13742726 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is there a contradiction in pic rel? I'm an antheist myself, but I can't imagine theres such a simple way to disprove the existance of a benevolent god.
30 posts and 3 images omitted
(21 replies)
No.13748691 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Does using newtons method to approximate a root only find one root? for the others do you have to select different values of x0?

How would you even know what sort of ballpark to have x0 in if you have a higher powers of x like $x^5$
16 posts and 1 image omitted
(5 replies)
No.13750842 ViewReplyOriginalReport
The incompleteness theorems can be applied to any Turing machine to imply the existence of statements it canmot prove or disprove. If we considered the brain as a computer, what would the form of this be?

Would it be a really difficult math proof humans are too dumb to solve? Or would it be "this sentence is false lmao kek 420"
(320 replies)
No.13715946 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
which uni is /sci/ from?
315 posts and 96 images omitted
(8 replies)

The Science fears this man

No.13750514 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>BTFOs racists & Vaccine pushers alike with facts and logic
>Doesn't mince words
>Calls for vaccine pushers to be put to death
Why does he keep winning /sci/?
3 posts omitted