From what I understand of evolution, a species is fit when it survives and adapts to its environment. In terms of human races, different survival strats have been adapted. For instance, the blacks basically reproduce as much as possible to make up for the lack of intelligence to manipulate their environment to make it more hospitable and easier to survive for the individual, whereas whites, jews, and east asians have very high raw intelligence and can survive and thrive using technology. Also, in the case of jews and asians, they rely heavily on deception and racial nepotism to get extra points in the survival category, especially in countries not founded or run by them, such as in the West.
Now that we see birth rates plummeting beyond the sustainable point for whites, asians, and jews, yet blacks continue to grow their numbers exponentially and interbreeding with other races adds to their numbers as well, isn't it just possible that the black survival strategy is the superior one and the white, jewish, and asian intelligence was just a fluke, an evolutionary experiment that worked for a while but just can't compete with the potency of black genes?
>gets revised every year yet claims to have absolute truth >full of contradicting theories (modern biology and the third law of thermodynamics) >is not neutral (used by by corporates and politicians for their own cause) >completely dismiss its contemporaries for "not being scientific" (the anti covid vaccine movement)
Please are there any youtube channels that go over this shit? My professor is a nightmare learning from, he doesn't cover what is in the hw problems, doesn't do any examples, and frankly, doesn't feel like he helps. He seems passionate but seems disconnected. I asked about the hw material and said only math i need is college algebra for this assignment, but i literally im doing integrations right now. Pchem2 if it matters which is more quantum based
>Every transcendental number can only be defined by an infinite calculation (sum or product of infinite series) >Thus, even in a hypothetical infinite universe, the true value of a transcendental number could never be exactly pinpointed >Thus, the actual "value" of a transcendental number cannot exist in a real universe in the same way a real universe could never contain anything infinitely old >The vast majority of real numbers are transcendental >In fact, if you were to throw a dart at number line between 0 and 1, the probability of landing on a non-transcendental number is basically zero >Since you are doing this in the real universe, the natural forces acting on the dart and the number line must resolve to a value >But no transcendental number's value could ever resolve in a finite amount of time and a finite amount of space >Thus the universe must be strictly quantized so that a non-transcendental number must realize as the outcome of physical phenomena
Does this make sense?
