what is it ACTUALLY like at the bottom of the ocean?
Threads by latest replies - Page 993
(13 replies)
(15 replies)
What would happen if you ate yourself?
(23 replies)
why so many people think earth is facking flat?
(16 replies)
Is professionalism in an academic setting a racist act? Is it negatively impacting scientific progress?
(5 replies)
Hello /sci/
I must admit the set up of this problem has made me feel like a brainlet.
Pic related shows three secondary circles and a primary circle. My problem is only two circles.
I have a primary circle, K and I have two types of circles A and B.
A and B each have smaller diameters than K.
A and B each have a different diameters.
The diameters of K, A, and B are all know and are finite numerical values.
Circles A and B each have a weighted score which is not correlated to their diameter.
The scores associated with A and B are both known finite numerical values.
How do I optimize the packing of these two circles into the main circle, K, such that the highest numerical score is achieved? The answer must contain the structure of the packed circles, as well as the maximum possible score.
I don't even know how to start with this one. I'm stumped friends.
I must admit the set up of this problem has made me feel like a brainlet.
Pic related shows three secondary circles and a primary circle. My problem is only two circles.
I have a primary circle, K and I have two types of circles A and B.
A and B each have smaller diameters than K.
A and B each have a different diameters.
The diameters of K, A, and B are all know and are finite numerical values.
Circles A and B each have a weighted score which is not correlated to their diameter.
The scores associated with A and B are both known finite numerical values.
How do I optimize the packing of these two circles into the main circle, K, such that the highest numerical score is achieved? The answer must contain the structure of the packed circles, as well as the maximum possible score.
I don't even know how to start with this one. I'm stumped friends.
(38 replies)
Round Table Discussion - Second Opinion
No.14148928 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>14149652 >>14149658
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jMONZMuS2U
https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html
Extremely compelling panel, many talking points presented here have been circulating on the internet for some time. I wanted to get /sci/ opinion. Mallone and Mcullough in attendence.
https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html
Extremely compelling panel, many talking points presented here have been circulating on the internet for some time. I wanted to get /sci/ opinion. Mallone and Mcullough in attendence.
(829 replies)
Previous >> 14142061
(7 replies)
what is this?
(82 replies)
Vaccines: How can we know if they are or aren't safe and effective if we can't view the data?
Is it normal to keep this kind of information secret while mandating that everyone take the substance in question (especially considering how mRNA technology has never been used like this before)?
Is it normal to keep this kind of information secret while mandating that everyone take the substance in question (especially considering how mRNA technology has never been used like this before)?
(7 replies)
are binaural beats legit?
