Threads by latest replies - Page 969

(28 replies)

How do you guys self-study? And why?

No.14150306 ViewReplyOriginalReport
23 posts and 5 images omitted
(5 replies)
No.14157314 ViewReplyOriginalReport
The metric system is pushed by liberal redditors who want to live in a pod and eat bugs. American measurements are based upon real life; how long is your foot? its a foot long. you can walk, putting one foot right in front of one another to roughly calculate distances. The mile is a measurement derived from the average length of one thousand paces, standardized upon the length of ancient roman emperor Marcus Agrippa's own foot. While using the imperial system is to embrace nature and reality, The metric system is a soulless, corporate system that views the world in a similar way to a robot; When a user of the imperial system sees a object that is 3ft tall, they can compare its height to other objects that are approximately three feet tall. When a metric soijack sees something that is 3 ft tall, they do not compare it to the things around them, but instead to an arbitrary distance standardized by some Mark Zuckerburg type ruler. Finally, the metric system is inherently globalist, as its users seek to spread it throughout every location on the globe instead of allowing cultures to make up there own system based upon their unique needs.

And that is why I say CM stands for "Communist Measurements".
(6 replies)
No.14157473 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>Be corporate finance accountant [CA/CFA]
>Be doing this for 10 years [11 next year]
>notice my software doing more of my work
>notice my staff are increasingly 3/4 accountants to 1/4 accountants [now 3/4 IT/HR]
>Notice we have a glut of accounting graduates
>accountant wages stagnant
>entire departments now automated
>entire areas of my job now done by software instead of a team of people
>guy coding for 2 years [not even a senior] is now better paid than CPA/CA's who are 5 years in

So this is what obsolescence feels like
1 post omitted
(6 replies)

What are some examples of soft and hard sciences

No.14157118 ViewReplyOriginalReport
And what are the shittiest of the soft sciences and shittiest of hard sciences?
Would the world be a better place if we just focused on hard sciences?
1 post omitted
(7 replies)
No.14156180 ViewReplyOriginalReport
How can i manipulate a new covid test still in box to be guaranteed negative without anyone noticing?
2 posts omitted
(15 replies)
No.14154955 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Are there any scientific reasons against storing nuclear waste in an already uninhabitable contaminated site like Chernobyl or Lake Karachay? I am a total layman, but it seems to be a better solution than permanently contaminating more land.
10 posts and 3 images omitted
(5 replies)
(33 replies)

As a mathematician I will never physically recover from this.

No.14154716 ViewReplyOriginalReport
28 posts and 2 images omitted
(20 replies)
No.14152249 ViewReplyOriginalReport
My sister, who is currently pursuing her PHD just sent me a "factchecker"(tm) style article in response to the Ron Johnson / Peter Mcullough Panel

https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2&fbclid=IwAR1oRrQFQ5M8yPsgdcqEVAY7ws8cpsDpxa4oDgSMjSlhd0vgoUPsYxdwI-I

The first matter in contention in the article is literally attacking a claim made by Dr.Peter Mcullough Dr. McCullough is recognized internationally as a leading figure in the study of chronic kidney disease as a cardiovascular risk state, having over 1,000 publications to his name and over 500 citations in the National Library of Medicine.

The article pits Mcullough's claim against an associate professor of health science... The HUBRIS of the modern world is truly poetic.
15 posts omitted
(5 replies)