Why would you use the gas constant (0.0821) in an ideal gas equation that doesn't have standard pressure or temperature

*makes a segment of /sci/ seethe merely by combining a resemblance to that segment of /sci/ that hates him but then succeeding far more than those haters on the haters' own terms*

I fucking love calculus now that I’m actually getting pretty good at it.

I present to you my rape theory of intelligence. I’ll explain. Notice how humans are smarter than retarded animals like the dolphin or otter. Well its because as we continued to rape chicks over the millennia they started to become tricksters and would make it harder to rape them perhaps by building walls or moving out of state. Either way early humans had to learn cleverer ways of doing what god put them on the earth to do. Either way women become smarter at stopping our rape but us rapists are smarterer
If anyone needs ill provide a works cited

What will happen once find out that other alien races do not have feelings and their way of thinking is strictly autistic and pragmatic?

You cannot dominate faster that light travel by having feelings for stuff, it's a really useless cerebral pathway.

"""""""""""""Natrual""""""""""""" units are fucking retarded and it makes no sense to set $c = \hbar$ no matter how you put it.

Continuation of >>14142363

>>14159171
>>REEEE it doesn't make sense when you repeat what I said!!!
Yeah, it doesn't make sense because only you made a jump from A to B that doesn't follow. Me saying that B doesn't follow from A is not an equivalent form of argument. You fail at basic logic.

>You quote a wiki article that justifies a theorem based entirely off the last wiki article you quoted that I demonstrated is wrong
The only thing you demonstrated to be wrong is your understanding of basic calculus and probability theory.

>it mindlessly treats 1/infinity as zero.
It doesn't. You don't understand what a limit is.

>It's a method for saying a trend approaches zero. It never makes the assertion, EVER, that the trend actually does reach zero.
What trend? The trend of a finite operation? You don't understand what a limit is.

>Limit of x to infinity in the function f(x)=1/x is zero, but f(x)=0 never touches the x axis.
Right, so why are you confusing one with the other? The function is not describing the probability over an infinite sample space, the limit is.

>Your wiki "Almost surely" article's justification that the probability was 0 that the coin would land heads infinitely literally said "letting n ? {\displaystyle n\rightarrow \infty } n\rightarrow \infty yields 0"
And?

>you are contradicting the wiki
How?

>You have not given a source that says 1/infinity is zero
Why would I? I never argued that. Another non sequitur.

>It is what he said
Nope, you just misrepresented it, which is apparently all you can do.

Just don't post if you have no idea what you're talking about.

Why does this chud praise Joe Rogan so much? Isnt he supposed to be an intellectual?

33121111313313

Sometimes wildly irrelevant thoughts enter my brain totally unrelated to what I'm currently thinking about. For example, just now
>thinking about a particular subsection of my taxes
>0.2 seconds after that enters my awareness I think of the "nearby grenade" sound from Call of Duty
Is this phenomenon maybe due to the neurons storing those thoughts being close to each other? That's the only thing I can think of to explain my brain's otherwise utterly random impulse to shoot "yo dude also THIS" into the forefront of my thought