is this a scientifically accurate analysis?

https://redcap.link/MSC_English

What are some good resources to read or watch on early humans in the Stone Age or Pleistocene?

Hey /sci/. I want learn DSP for SDR shiet. But im absolute newbie in math and physics. Recommend math books from high school to university level and good books for signals,DSP etc.

>asking retarded questions makes me smart

What is the best way to tackle them? First head for the many-points questions or something else? I feel I always fuck up and run out of time, because I never have a proper way of going through an exam

yo
does our insulin resistance raises with the consumption of fruits/sweets/ice cream caused by seasons?

or is it necessary to have lower and higher sugars ingestion during the year cycle?

The Invention of the Retro-Ferromagnet A.K.A. The Nano-Dynamo: A New Approach to Electrical Transmission with Comparable Efficiency to Superconduction/Retro-Ferromagnetically Enhanced Conduction (RFEC)

Having explored many approaches to achieving room-temperature superconduction and having found all of those approaches lacking, I have concluded that the amount of force necessary to control the spin-orientations of each electron in a series to facilitate superconduction exceeds that which can be generated through Coulomb forces generated phononically or through application of pressure through other means such as a coil. Generating the necessary force would also have the effect of breaking any atom-thickness material or lattice structure since these structures tend to be brittle, and even more durable structures would not stand up to high levels of torque. Crystal structures would shatter or would experience a morphing of their structure before generating the force necessary to bring about a charge density wave at room temperature.

In what sense does set theory really 'provide' a foundation of mathematics when it's a later historical development over geometry, arithmetic, analysis, etc. ?

Why does mathematics which was applied effectively prior to concerns about 'foundations' need to be 'grounded' outside the human faculty for rationality and abstraction? Sets are more 'primitive' mathematical objects than groups, fields, algebras etc., but the historical development shows that if anything the more basic problems of algebra and geometry which occupied people throughout the majority of the common era are the true foundation of mathematics, rather than set theory which represents a higher level of abstraction than was achieved previously---but does greater generality really count as a 'foundation' when the causality of its historical development is reversed, especially when the construction of basic objects i.e the natural numbers is so clumsy?

Que sucedio con Jacobo grinberg?