Threads by latest replies - Page 902

(10 replies)
No.14178162 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Average " " avoider
5 posts and 1 image omitted
(14 replies)
No.14178155 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>science is... LE RELIGION
9 posts and 2 images omitted
(12 replies)

Can west africans be considered closer to primates

No.14178266 ViewReplyOriginalReport
The negro skull, in addition to having a smaller brain volume and thicker cranial bones than that of the White, is prognathous ; i.e., the lower face projects forward in the manner of an animal's muzzle. The negro jaw is substantially longer, relative to its width, than the White jaw. A feature of the negro lower jaw is its retention of a vestige of the "simian shelf," a bony region immediately behind the incisors. The simian shelf is a distinguishing characteristic of apes, and it is absent in Whites.

They emit a peculiar offensive body odor similar to apes.

Just as their black skin protected them from the intense African sun, they are inherently lazy in order to prevent over exertion in that intense sun.

The arms and legs of the negro are relatively longer than the European. The humerus is shorter and the forearm longer thereby approximating the ape form.

The eye often has a yellowish scierotic coat over it like that of a gorilla.

The negro has a shorter trunk; the cross-section of the chest is more circular than Whites. Similar to an ape.

The pelvis is narrower and longer as it is in an ape.

The negro has a larger and shorter neck akin to that of apes.

The ears are roundish, rather small, standing somewhat high and detached thus approaching the ape form.

The jaw is larger and stronger and protrudes outward which, along with lower retreating forehead, gives a facial angle of 68 to 70 degrees, like an ape, as opposed to a facial angle of 80 to 82 degrees for Europeans.

The three curvatures of the spine are less pronounced in the negro than in the white and thus more characteristic of an ape.

The two bones proper of the nose are occasionally united, as in apes.

Taxonomists and geneticists believe that negros should be classified as different species. In fact, Darwin declared in The Descent of Man that the negros are so distinct that similar differences found in any other animal would warrant their classification as a different species.
7 posts omitted
(5 replies)
No.14177008 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Will the only upper hand we have on future A.I be the ability to use psychedelic compounds?
(42 replies)
No.14177716 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is this accurate?
37 posts and 5 images omitted
(5 replies)

The unsolved Problem of Tg in amorphous structures

No.14178363 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I am currently studying in the fields of technical mineralogy and no one has an answer for "what happens to the structre of glass when it changing from fluid to solid?"
(5 replies)

SpaceX - Starship won't reach orbit in 2022 - Bet

No.14178273 ViewReplyOriginalReport
SpaceX is planning to send a "Starship" to orbit in 2022. I will list all the reasons that this is not possible with its current configuration:
>100 tons to orbit is a joke. This is a lightweight metal-can with not enough structural integrity to carry that much weight on TOP of a huge massive fuel tank.
>The flimsy steel is not going to survive Max-Q and is more likely to break apart
>There are too many "Raptor" engines, which means way more points of failure. If one or a few of them fail, there will not be enough thrust to get it to orbital speeds.
>No orbital abort system like a Saturn V

That's a good start. It is very unlikely that SpaceX Starship will make it to orbit, let alone the moon or Mars. Landing 100-tons of payload on mars is a WHOLE other impossible can of worms, the most humanity has ever landed on Mars was about 2-tons. 100tons on Mars is completely laughable.

I bet $100 that SpaceX Starship will not reach orbit in 2022, unless it somehow undergoes a massive redesign. If I win, I'll donate $100 to St. Jude Children's Hospital in my name. If I lose, I'll donate $100 to SJCH on behalf of SpaceX Starship.
(5 replies)

How much better would this world be without scientists?

No.14178361 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Scientists are not smart. They are trained animals, fit only to regurgitate their learned lessons in order to deceive mankind with their seemingly big vocabulary which is nothing but worthless jargon.
(5 replies)
(8 replies)
No.14177309 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I WANNA BE A GOOD PERSON
PUBLIC HEALTH IS MY CAUSE
(DUN DUN DUN)
THE VACCINE IS OUR NEXT STEP
LET'S KILL THE BAT-FLU OFF

IT HAS TRAVELLED ACROSS THE LAND
INFECTING NATIONS WIDE
(DUN DUN DUN)

AND IF A SHOT IS ALL IT TAKES...
TO SLOW IT THEN IT'S TIIIIIIIIME


TAKE THE JAB (GOTTA SAVE US ALLLLLL)
GET THE VACCINE
IT'S BETTER FOR YOU AND ME

GET THE JAB
NOOOOOOOOOO DON'T BE A CHUD
IT'S THE EXPERTS WE SHOULD TRUST

GET THE JAB (GOTTA SAVE US ALLLLLL)
NEWTON WOULD TOOOOOOOOOO
SO PHYSICS GRADS FOLLOW SUIT

IT'S BEST WE TAKE THE VACCINE
SAVE THE WOOOOOOORLLLD

GOTTA SAVE US ALLLLLL
GOTTA SAVE US ALLLLLL
TAKE THE JAB
3 posts and 2 images omitted