Threads by latest replies - Page 739

193KiB, 424x202, 149028874_1145313905900184_8421926612731493113_n_1.webm

View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 14 Feb 18:18:56 2022 No.14229116 ViewReplyOriginalReport

Quoted By: >>14229147 >>14229247

mating is natural
other animals have a set rules to do it
Why isn't there a /sci/entific way of love for humans too?

45KiB, 430x629, A Responsible Adult Says No to Non-Orientable Shapes_3.jpg

View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 12 Feb 22:58:14 2022 No.14222627 ViewReplyOriginalReport

Quoted By: >>14229225

Does anyone here unironically understand higher dimensions?

44 posts and 6 images omitted

307KiB, 696x677, Starship Update kind of.png

View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO

Starship Update - but no dates or timelines?

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 18:32:20 2022 No.14225370 ViewReplyOriginalReport

Quoted By:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3N7L8Xhkzqo
>Claims we can bring animals with us. We basically can’t, any animal in zero-gravity basically freaks the fuck out, can’t eat, pukes, and would die.
>I agree we should be spending less money on deadbeats, and more money on NASA. We have poor people in the US who are OVERWEIGHT, obviously they’re getting too much food.
>Rapidly reusable - StarShip takes at least 3-hours to stack, let alone fill with fuel and cargo, and systems inspections.
>Turnaround time on Falcon 9 is like 2-months
>Claims that NOT ONLY will a single Starship be able to launch 100+ tons to orbit (which it hasn’t even done yet), but thinks that they will somehow launch this same starship 3 TIMES PER DAY, at some unknown point in the future. 1 Starship every 8 hours (which is just completely insane), and Super Heavy Booster being reused EVERY hour, which is like even more insane.
>Goal of making 1-stack per month (12/year)
>1 Million tons to orbit by date when??
>”You can only go to Mars every two years” Holy shit he said something accurate!!
>1 Million tons on Mars to have a functioning city
>“We need to do this as quickly as possible”. Why? There’s literally no cosmic threat to Earth for at least another 100 years. Asteroid Mining would be more prescient than a Mars colony.
1/3

32 posts and 5 images omitted

147KiB, 1080x1056, 167824.jpg

View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 14 Feb 18:36:51 2022 No.14229164 ViewReplyOriginalReport

Quoted By: >>14229174

Is the gay gene real?

261KiB, 538x301, ?????????.png

View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO

Textbooks

Anonymous Mon 14 Feb 18:34:41 2022 No.14229158 ViewReplyOriginalReport

Quoted By: >>14229159 >>14229169

Post pictures of science textbooks that are pleasant to read or informative or just worth being read at all owing to some merits. You can also describe your choice if you wish.
I will start.

368KiB, 1300x868, vulcan pathfinder.jpg

View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO

/sfg/ - Space Flight General

Anonymous Sun 13 Feb 18:31:55 2022 No.14225369 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport

Quoted By:

240tf Edition

Previous: >>14222469

NEWS:
nothing too new
>PSLV launch today I think?
>Starlinks fall out of the sky
>why do I even bother you guys know everything that is going on

THIS DAY IN SPACE FLIGHTL
•nothing of note, just a couple of sats launched in the 70s and 80s. First flight of Vega launched in 2012 on this day

1051 posts and 172 images omitted

173KiB, 821x806, elo2.png

View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO

Elo

Anonymous Mon 14 Feb 17:04:57 2022 No.14228916 ViewReplyOriginalReport

Quoted By: >>14229145

Can someone explain to me how p and dp work?
Like if you and someone else are rated 1000, and you beat them does that mean you're still 1000? Because 1000+0 rating difference/1?

109KiB, 736x736, 1644851531797.jpg

View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO

The Future of Humanity

Anonymous Mon 14 Feb 17:22:29 2022 No.14228973 ViewReplyOriginalReport

Quoted By: >>14229051

Scientifically speaking, would it be more optimal for the future if women became larger and men were smaller? Think about it logically: smaller men will have denser muscle's and be more agile and also will require less space and resources. These men could also have artificially enhanced IQ to even further increase their effectiveness.

Women would be enlarged as well. I believe this to be the best future for humanity.

Thoughts?

3 posts and 1 image omitted

168KiB, 1031x1534, 182525251.jpg

View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO

Uh oh

Anonymous Sat 12 Feb 22:53:18 2022 No.14222602 ViewReplyOriginalReport

Quoted By: >>14224726 >>14228835

Another fail incoming?

23 posts and 5 images omitted

1MiB, 800x392, Neurofeedback_Process_Diagram.png

View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO

EEG Neurofeedback for ADHD

Anonymous Mon 14 Feb 17:49:38 2022 No.14229054 ViewReplyOriginalReport

Quoted By:

Is it legit or a sham?