if the uni is expanding.... w-w-what is it expanding.... into?
Threads by latest replies - Page 705
(55 replies)
(19 replies)
Not sure why, I looked at the degree on LinkedIn to see who had it and what jobs they went on to get, it's mainly women, in fact I didn't see a man. What does this mean, it was a bioinformatics masters if you're curious.
(17 replies)
Is reliability engineering a good field?
Seems like it's not very popular and would be a good career choice.
Seems like it's not very popular and would be a good career choice.
(9 replies)
How do medical school students manage to memorize such a high volume of information in their first years of medical school?
(27 replies)
how do I argue against a cringe determinist who thinks free will isn't real is there any papers in support of libertarian metaphysics I can show him
(5 replies)
Economics applied to the dating market
No.14238390 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>14238508 >>14238813 >>14238820 >>14238842
>Browse FDS
>Realize it’s just women sabotaging each other, encouraging women to ‘level’ up, and be “Queens”.
>Econ 101: Supply and Demand
>They are intent on increasing the supply of available men by sabotaging each other’s relationship, resulting in more single men who might me willing to date them.
>They are intent on lowering the supply of women by promoting that it’s fine being single and living your own life. The “Queen” way.
>At the same time, they are intent on lowering the demand for men so that men will settle for them or chase/pursue them.
They are intent on increasing the demand for women by being (anti-pornography), porn is bad yes but it also gives men a useful release instead of having to put up with an annoying woman just to have sex/ejaculate. This is also why they are vehemently against sex work which is also bad because a lot of what women offer is sex and if men can easily get sex for let’s say 50 euros an hour, the demand for women goes down.
I think that secretly a lot of them are homophobic but only against men (gay) because that lowers the supply of men but will encourage lesbianism because that will take women out of the dating market.
>Realize it’s just women sabotaging each other, encouraging women to ‘level’ up, and be “Queens”.
>Econ 101: Supply and Demand
>They are intent on increasing the supply of available men by sabotaging each other’s relationship, resulting in more single men who might me willing to date them.
>They are intent on lowering the supply of women by promoting that it’s fine being single and living your own life. The “Queen” way.
>At the same time, they are intent on lowering the demand for men so that men will settle for them or chase/pursue them.
They are intent on increasing the demand for women by being (anti-pornography), porn is bad yes but it also gives men a useful release instead of having to put up with an annoying woman just to have sex/ejaculate. This is also why they are vehemently against sex work which is also bad because a lot of what women offer is sex and if men can easily get sex for let’s say 50 euros an hour, the demand for women goes down.
I think that secretly a lot of them are homophobic but only against men (gay) because that lowers the supply of men but will encourage lesbianism because that will take women out of the dating market.
(8 replies)
Simple question /sci/
Can I collect data like filled out questionnaires without having a legal entity behind me if I declare not to share it with third parties and then publish the dataset after anonymizing it?
Would this dataset receive criticism if it were used in studies?
Should I perform identity checks?
Can I collect data like filled out questionnaires without having a legal entity behind me if I declare not to share it with third parties and then publish the dataset after anonymizing it?
Would this dataset receive criticism if it were used in studies?
Should I perform identity checks?
(5 replies)
what is sleep?
(46 replies)
Best ways to avoid deep vein thrombosis?
(5 replies)
ON MY DESK!! MONDAY MORNING!!!
