What is this and how do I get rid of it

>peak science isn't rea-

What exactly is an electrolyte, I tried googling it and I don't really understand why we need external things to build an electrical current in our bodies. I don't really Even understand the whole relationship between electricity and out bodies in general. You guys are smart so I figured you might be able to explain it in more casual terms to a brainlet

If this book is true, what does that mean for Science?

Who was the greatest polymath in this pic?

Many Worlds is the most scary QM interpretation. Besides the implication of an infinite number of universes, it is so chaotic and mind bogglingly vast that it’s almost certainly means there is no God or order or sense or reason to existence and everything is ultimately meaningless on a cosmological scale. Meaningless and vast beyond comprehension.

If Many Worlds is correct, I don’t want to live in such a universe.

Redpill me on heat transfer.
Is this one discipline, usually found in mechanical engineering departments, the source of all interesting phenomena?
Chemical reactions?
>heat transfer via atomic vibrations exchanging energy with each other
Condensed matter physics?
>electron and phonon heat transfer
Astrophysics?
>radiation/photon heat transfer
Biochemistry?
>same as chemical reactions
Literally every technology?
>all limited by heat transfer
Sexy mathematics?
>Check out the physics of electron/phonon heat transfer, macroscopic PDEs, convective fluid dynamics, etc.
Why shouldn't we all become heat transfer masters?
It's literally everywhere... FUUGGGG i have such a hard-on for heat right now

I know there are a lot of pro-mandators on this board, and you guys tend to think that you are pro-science, but then you guys constantly smear your opponents and deny basic fact's such the fact that vaccines cause myocarditis and other issues.

This is not a conspiracy theory. The CDC and literally DOZENS of other health agencies in numerous countries have recognized myocarditis as a genuine risk, and you can find multiple peer-reviewed studies on the topic on pubmed and google scholar. If you deny this risk, then your are engaging in partisan disinformation and are taking an anti-science perspective.

The real question that you need to be asking, and which actual scientists and doctors ask when evaluating these issues is "what are the relative risks and relative benefits". All medicines have some risk of side effects. All medicines have risks and benefits that need to be weighed and compared. Claiming that vaccines cause myocarditis is not "anti-science", nor is it "disinformation", nor is it a "conspiracy theory". It is simply an objectively true, scientific claim, that has been documented and acknowledged by multiple government agencies and numerous scholars and researchers in the field of bio-medicine. Now does that mean the other claims of the "anti-vaxxers" are correct? No, of course not, but as a simple matter of fact, we know that the vaccine do present such risks. The real question is, do the benefits of the vaccine outweigh those risks, but to categorically deny the existence of these risks at all is simply intellectually dishonest.

Are nootropics real? I'm not talking herbal foo-foo stuff like crow toes and nutmeg, but pharmaceuticals, research chemicals and the like. I see people talk about them now and then, but seldom with any sources.

Example #455,345 of why Reddit vaccine-disaster posts shared enthusiastically on /pol/ and patriots.win aren't worth a bucket of piss.