What is the most modern anti-depressant? What's the newest, tightest shit?
Threads by latest replies - Page 597
(36 replies)
(6 replies)
It's impossible to please you.
(5 replies)
I still don't have anyone yet so I'll post this again. I am looking for a clingy friendless irl STEM(specifically chemistry) enthusiast friend who has aspergers, lives in washington state and wont be friends with other people because I (still) have no friends. Add me at
Frankenstein#3483
If and only if you meet the criteria and are willing to interact with me in person.
Frankenstein#3483
If and only if you meet the criteria and are willing to interact with me in person.
(8 replies)
>In number theory, the general number field sieve (GNFS) is the most efficient classical algorithm known for factoring integers larger than 10^100.
>The quadratic sieve algorithm (QS) is an integer factorization algorithm and, in practice, the second fastest method known (after the general number field sieve). It is still the fastest for integers under 100 decimal digits or so, and is considerably simpler than the number field sieve.
What's the likelihood this is actually true, versus the likelihood the NSA, KGB, Mossad, etc has some top secret faster classical algorithm that simply hasnt been discovered publically? Do we have historical evidence of this kind of thing, purely mathematical discoveries being kept secret by the governments who discover them?
>The quadratic sieve algorithm (QS) is an integer factorization algorithm and, in practice, the second fastest method known (after the general number field sieve). It is still the fastest for integers under 100 decimal digits or so, and is considerably simpler than the number field sieve.
What's the likelihood this is actually true, versus the likelihood the NSA, KGB, Mossad, etc has some top secret faster classical algorithm that simply hasnt been discovered publically? Do we have historical evidence of this kind of thing, purely mathematical discoveries being kept secret by the governments who discover them?
(81 replies)
do any of the zoomers here that still in school have this progressive stack stuff in ur classes unironically?
seems like it should lead to all sorts of comic perverse outcomes, plz regale me with ur tales of progressive stacking in science classes.
seems like it should lead to all sorts of comic perverse outcomes, plz regale me with ur tales of progressive stacking in science classes.
(75 replies)
Why doesn't it apply to the real world, or alternatively, why don't we have infinite mass/energy everywhere? Is the measure of each point in space zero?
(5 replies)
What is the sciencitic explanation of having a small solid bit firmly lodged in the gum, that I had to take out with tweezers?
Ive had my wisdom teeth removed a month and the piece was near the molars but as deep as my wisdom teeth were
Ive had my wisdom teeth removed a month and the piece was near the molars but as deep as my wisdom teeth were
(10 replies)
>At the surface of the Earth, the flux is about 65 billion (6.5×1010) solar neutrinos, per second per square centimeter.
How do we harvest this energy? Would it have a meaningful impact on the global energy production/ consumption?
Or is it far easier to just focus on photovoltaics?
All I could find on the web are shady businesses fishing for investments.
How do we harvest this energy? Would it have a meaningful impact on the global energy production/ consumption?
Or is it far easier to just focus on photovoltaics?
All I could find on the web are shady businesses fishing for investments.
(5 replies)
so when did you discover the beauty of geometric algebra?
a = abb-1
= (a?b + a?b)b-1
= (a?b)b-1 + (a?b)b-1
a = abb-1
= (a?b + a?b)b-1
= (a?b)b-1 + (a?b)b-1
(67 replies)
How much would science benefit from such a country?
