Threads by latest replies - Page 3604

(74 replies)

ITT: we discuss scientism

No.13335216 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
its not that “science isnt real” its that
“Science” has become a weaponized political
category of unimpeachable authority,
in other words, people appeal to “science”
as if their interpretations of scientific research
are equivelant to Truth or moral imperatives,
and its the reason why these self righteous
cunts believe the “science is settled conspiratard”
meme, because it validates their “superioty”
(ironically, it is simply a faith based appeal
to the power structure, disguised as
agant garde thinking)

and i would add that relying on this
appeal to the power structure as the
justification for your dismissal of
countervailing facts or narratives
with smugness, you are likely inferior

in my opinion, Science is used to
browbeat people into submission
it hass become a function
of oppressive rule and the creation of vice, rather than a legitimate
pursuit.

it is the modern king-maker, though instead
coronation in the sight of GOD and all men
it is set in the dark corners of the abyss
and all attendees, these mystic clans, the modern day witch doctors
converge to plot their ascendancy


and another thing to add to this is the
way scientists actually are promoted in
their fields. from what i understand, its
difficult to do anything or get grant money
if you dont tow the line of “the orthodoxy”
69 posts and 28 images omitted
(29 replies)
No.13335162 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>Quantum Suicide

>A man sits down before a gun, which is pointed at his head. This is no ordinary gun; it's rigged to a machine that measures the spin of a quantum particle. Each time the trigger is pulled, the spin of the quantum particle -- or quark -- is measured. Depending on the measurement, the gun will either fire, or it won't. If the quantum particle is measured as spinning in a clockwise motion, the gun will fire. If the quark is spinning counterclockwise, the gun won't go off. There'll only be a click.

>Nervously, the man takes a breath and pulls the trigger. The gun clicks. He pulls the trigger again. Click. And again: click. The man will continue to pull the trigger again and again with the same result: The gun won't fire. Although it's functioning properly and loaded with bullets, no matter how many times he pulls the trigger, the gun will never fire. He'll continue this process for eternity, becoming immortal.

>Go back in time to the beginning of the experiment. The man pulls the trigger for the very first time, and the quark is now measured as spinning clockwise. The gun fires. The man is dead.

>But, wait. The man already pulled the trigger the first time -- and an infinite amount of times following that -- and we already know the gun didn't fire. How can the man be dead? The man is unaware, but he's both alive and dead. Each time he pulls the trigger, the universe is split in two. It will continue to split, again and again, each time the trigger is pulled

I genuinely have no idea how you're meant to consider this as feasible. Logic dictates eventually the cylinder will turn onto the loaded chamber.
24 posts and 1 image omitted
(32 replies)

Using Organic Chemistry to Form an Instantaneous Link to the Future

No.13332594 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Now that I have your attention... (see next post)
27 posts and 4 images omitted
(37 replies)
No.13334224 ViewReplyOriginalReport
For the first time I have the opportunity to take the vaccine.
I'm young, without health problems but I want to become an exchange student in the fall.
So should I do it? Well reasoned arguments only please.
32 posts and 12 images omitted
(7 replies)
No.13335384 ViewReplyOriginalReport
mathematichads > enginiggers >> scientards

scientifically speaking, what is the evolutionary purpose of this fact?
2 posts and 1 image omitted
(37 replies)
No.13336448 ViewReplyOriginalReport
is there a scientific explanation for why this racist isn't banned from twitter?
32 posts omitted
(17 replies)

if your doctor doesnt look like this

No.13335643 ViewReplyOriginalReport
why would you trust him? ad hominem is very valid in medicine since your internal health reflects outside
12 posts and 5 images omitted
(5 replies)

Which came first?

No.13335144 ViewReplyOriginalReport
If an idea is born from man, did it exist before it was conceived from man or did it exist before it was born unto man?
(5 replies)

which job class is good for a solo player?

No.13336580 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I have 2-4 hours of free time daily to master a class to make money
I have maxed creativity attribute though have a passive logic skill that makes me hyper-efficient
>i think college is a scam and don't want to work for a company that wants a team player
(17 replies)
No.13336362 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>science is whatever trump has said but reversed
THANKS FOR FORCING US TO WEAR MASKS TRUMP
12 posts and 4 images omitted