>>13332903I theorize that there are two different methods causing information to flow into the past. One is the long way and one is the short way. Depending upon which one you use, you either create a self-fulfilling prophecy (the einstein-rosen bridge does this) or you alter the past and potentially render predictions incorrect.
The method that alters the past is called tachyonic trajection. Particles such as neutrinos can be inverted to a state of negative mass, and the longer that state is preserved, the farther back in time they can fly. This variable is determined by their spin, which is determined by how many magnetons they come in proximity of and at what range. A series of near-collisions followed by a collision are the steps necessary to create a tachyon. A neutrino detector would be required on the backend to receive the messages.
This method is really the more difficult way, and it risks voiding the integrity of predictions. ERB predictions are troublesome because sometimes you want to prevent the thing you are predicting, and making observations in this way actually forces them to happen. The fact that the event is reiterated through a higher dimensional plane results in inputs to all of the necessary points in space-time from seemingly out of nowhere to facilitate the outcome.
For example, if the machine predicts that I am going to win the lottery and I choose not to buy a ticket, electrons may populate out of nowhere in the brain of an attractive woman. Those electrons cause her to want to buy a bottle of wine, which leads her to go to a liquor store. I see her there and because I see her, follow her into the store, which also sells lottery tickets so I can ask her out. Regardless of whether she agrees to the date or not, now that I'm in the store, I capitulate and choose to buy a lottery ticket.
This is hand of God stuff here, but it's not God, it's a causal loop.
