if decentrilized battery and solar power become economcially feasible they will be very popular.
but i heard some firemen say it would be a nightmare in case of a fire if every house has a battery charged with the power to last a house days (not to mention a big building) in it.
would it be possible to implement some sort of safety for this? a way to disipate the energy without it being dangerous? like some sort of controlled short circuit? im guessing it woudl have to be the most energy inneficient way to dispose of energy
"I theorize that magneton-neutrino collisions, specifically those involving high-spin neutrinos (very rare due to their small size) have the effect of reducing the mass of the particle to a negative number, which means for the neutrino that its negative mass will propel it beyond the speed of light."
"I theorize that magneton-neutrino collisions, specifically those involving high-spin neutrinos (very rare due to their small size) have the effect of reducing the mass of the particle to a negative number, which means for the neutrino that its negative mass will propel it beyond the speed of light."
Is there a way to tell if what I searched for existed in that spot before I searched for it? I searched something pretty long and the page it was on only contained that text, while every other page is completely full. The website is a spook right?
Hypothetically speaking, if you could create a neutrino generator with fine enough beam control that you could hit a target to within about 1/10th of an angstrom, and those neutrinos skimmed over top of a skyrmion lattice, what effect would the proximity to the magnetons (east-west) have on the passing neutrinos? Would spin increase?
If so, what would happen if the high-spin neutrinos then encountered a second lattice, arranged to be just a tick higher than the first, so that the neutrinos would, rather than "nearly colliding" would actually collide into a wall of magnetons.
What happens when a high-spin neutrino and a magneton intersect with each other? Negative mass is attained and is preserved. When the neutrino is not spinning, the neutrino regains its mass so quickly that our instruments cannot measure the length of time this takes.
What's more interesting is that, depending on the spin velocity, the tachyons generated arrive at different points in the past, presumably because the spin helps them to resist re-accumulation of their Higgs Field in flight.
I saw this thread in the archive and thought it was nice, so I will start one.
I've started watching OCW lectures on different CS subjects I'm interested in, and very quickly I'm realizing that there is a lot of math involved that I've all but forgotten since college. Are there resources on, I guess, math in computer science?
Does it matter where you ground a circuit? This man built a 6000V DC power supply (I'm not going to build such a thing.), and he grounded the doubler circuit to the point in-between the capacitors. (You can see he grounded it to the block of the transformer, which is also grounded to the case.) The Organic Chemistry Tutor grounds the circuit at the negative terminal of the second capacitor. Does it make a difference where you reference ground.
"One of the reasons we were able to make the vaccines so quick is because mrna vaccines are extremely fast to make!"
Ok, so then we cut the process down from 10 years to about 10 months by using a super fast to produce type of vaccine.
Except now there are lots of other vaccine types coming out, like 3 months later than the mrna vaccines.
Even though supposedly a big reason we have vaccines now instead of in 5-10 years is because of how much faster mrna vaccines are to produce. Obviously, many orders of magnitude faster.
And yet despite that, here we are several months after mrna vaccines released, and we are already seeing non-mrna ones come out.
Even though "MRNA VACCINES ARE SUPER QUICK TO MAKE THATS WHY WE HAVE THEM NOW AND NOT IN 10 YEARS we would be so slow with regular vax :( ".
So, how is this particular reason not a load of tripe that was boiled up to feed to the lowest common denominators of the population that cannot think?
Clearly they are able to make non-mrna vaccines on a comparable timeline to the pfizer ones. It's not a multiple year wait. BS excuse.
