Did Tacky Jon predict of the string theory make time causal break? The tacky Jon knowledge did interesting to physics.

Studying what caused the big bang is the study of god. Whatever caused the big bang, IS god.

Reminder that since god exists, studying god is scientific.

The key to happiness is to enjoy every moment of your remaining life in this world.

Irrational numbers contain an infinite string of decimals that contain every possible combination of numbers including sequences that could be decoded into texts that include every book written, but also texts not yet conceived such as for example indisputable, conclusive, factual scientific proof of God.
And since you can't prove a negative there will never be anything that can be interpreted as counterevidence.
>inb4 but it also contains proof that God isn't real

Before you say anything stupid be aware you're just reiterating strings of random numbers that existed long before you.

It's a matter of time before a quantum computer decodes these numbers into relevant texts with knowledge and guidance that will dawn a new Era of understanding and acceptance for humanity. The current science based hysteric atheism is the work of God. They will be undone by their own findings and creations, because the more they study nature and the cosmos, the more they discover the divinity of life. Soon, denial of such will no longer be a sane option.

Their scepticism and lack of faith will be the very root of a new spiritual age for mankind.
Science and religion will soon be interchangeable and codependent terms.
We will have machines of God and professors of faith.

Any advice on how to come out to my conservative mathematician parents as an engineer?

Easy. Here's why.

>Go to a random latitude in northern hemisphere
>Circumnavigate the earth at this latitude
>Record distance
>Go to same latitude in southern hemisphere
>Do the same shit
>Realise that they are both the same distance and the southern latitude distance is not greater than the northern latitude distance, despite what the flat earth model depicts

Climate change and coronavirus are both scientific topics which have become too political to be discussed scientifically, I think that both topics should be aggressively removed from /sci/ via censorship so that we can focus on actual scientific discussion instead of being blanketed with endless political propaganda.
Does anyone unirnically disagree with this sentiment? If so, please state your IQ and the specifics of your disagreement, I will endeavor to reply to all arguments against the ban, but prioritize the highest IQ responses.

Hi, can someone explain how the N(d1) and N(d2) terms are calculated? I know it's a statistics thing but I barely passed statistics and I'm not sure what google search term to use to find the answer.

lmao@tranny jannie

>akshully...
just shut the fuck up drone and get in your cage
NO your stem degree is not impressive
NO adding "rational" "objective" "scientific" "efficient" to things is not the end of the discussion or an argument
NO 99% of you are not "useful"
NO you don't understand what "useful" is
NO you are not anything more than a cattle caste cuck
NO you don't have any self awarness
NO you don't understand anything outside the surface level assertions of your little specialty
NO you are not valuable
NO you are not intelligent
YES you are shame to humanity
YES you should be rounded up for the camps