I'm here to make a huge change in the world and you get to decide what change will it be. Choose wisely anons, I'm not joking.

People say that this is how Black Holes looks like...but people miss this:
The black part is the Event Horizont, which is just where the Black Hole gravity is so massive nothing can be seen, because not even light can escape it.
So the Black Hole itself is just what its inside the Event Horizont.

So what do you think is inside a Black Hole? Its is still an star, a planetoid, or something else? What could it look like?

Suppose you have a 1L 4-stroke engine that intakes 35°C air with a humidity of 10%, compresses it to .1L, then injects water such that the exhaust is saturated with vapor without condensate. I calculate that such an engine would adiabatically produce 17 kJ per cycle without pumping losses. However, the power would be limited by the actual rate of evaporation, but I'm at a loss of how to calculate the maximum power this engine could produce.

Schools suck, so I thought about a way of how to structure the educational system so that it can't be fucked up

7-19 seems like the best age bracket
1. Subjects divided into the branches of science that they cover:
Instead of bits of cosmology here and there, make it a separate subject, instead of all of it being under 'Physics'.
2. A massive exam at the end of the year that covers everything, instead of just couple of tests here and there covering few topics each.
3. Adding more subjects, such as Economics, Finance, and so on.
4. Semi-mandatory training outside of one's hometown to teach discipline and the importance of good physical condition, in the last year of education (18-19).
5. Ability to write final exams for years that haven't yet been covered, so as to allow people to skip years.

The best thing about it? Constant remainder for people to not waste time. You don't want to undergo training? You are forced to learn a year of education on your own, which will teach you discipline anyways.

Now we just have to design a curriculum that covers as many subjects as possible (so that people stop choosing meme degrees), to an extent that fully utilizes the children's potential. Feel free to post any books, instead of just saying what people should know

Any historical records or scientific experiments of impossibly charged objects coming near an insulating body and leaving lictenberg fissures?

Change my mind.

Stefan Gates in his book Gastronaut discusses eating dried nasal mucus, and says that 44% of people he questioned said they had eaten their own dried nasal mucus in adulthood and said they liked it.[3] As mucus filters airborne contaminants, eating it could be thought to be unhealthy; Gates comments that "our body has been built to consume snot", because the nasal mucus is normally swallowed after being moved inside by the motion of the cilia.[3] Friedrich Bischinger, a lung specialist at Privatklinik Hochrum in Innsbruck,[4] says that nose-picking and eating could actually be beneficial for the immune system.[5][6]

There is literally zero reason not to eat your boogers; a high IQ activity.

If the bible is right and we have free choice, does this mean that low iq people are simply lazy on purpose?

Let's just say i have found out how to make roads far more durable than now with fraction of price increase. Where do i tell people how to do it? Who do i talk to? Goverment? Police?

It has something to do with graphene and asphalt

was expecting there to be a defined mathemathical model for walk cycle for biped/quadrupeds to produce a solid animation like this regularly just so the entire production can be even more streamlined in a minimum standard at least?

somethin about a normal walk cycle of different parts in different timing ; spacings produced based on either speed, weight, and the supposed frame. Or maybe just avoiding unwanted, floaty jittering and produce "realism"?

Somethinf flexible enough to produce the same motion(or different motions) in variety of view too


There was a suggestion of studying IK/inverse kinematics, but then the reading kinda stopped at "building a walk" in which IK does not produce walking but merely satisfying a position based on external elements that is not part of the human body.
so i still need to know what's good "walking", "cycle", "balance", and somethinf about "no jitter or limp"

so there should be several texts about these four each or one whole thing? maybe even in the particular perspective too just to avoid looking flat