Threads by latest replies - Page 3374

(6 replies)
No.13403780 ViewReplyOriginalReport
My research is going nowhere.
1 post omitted
(25 replies)

0.999... = 1

No.13403973 ViewReplyOriginalReport
20 posts and 5 images omitted
(5 replies)
(7 replies)
No.13404909 ViewReplyOriginalReport
People who have a wealth of knowledge in the medical field, how do you live knowing the plethora of ways we can get rekt at any moment?
2 posts omitted
(16 replies)

you are smarter than a toddler.... right /sci/?

No.13404527 ViewReplyOriginalReport
11 posts and 1 image omitted
(24 replies)
No.13404676 ViewReplyOriginalReport
scientificaly speaking why do gays and LGBTQP people exist??
19 posts omitted
(11 replies)

Suspicious0bservers

No.13403410 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is there any truth to the electric universe theory?
6 posts and 1 image omitted
(14 replies)
No.13405045 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What's going to happen to all the massive suburbs when American city planning inevitably moves away from this philosophy and cities become more condensed like they should be?
9 posts and 1 image omitted
(5 replies)
No.13405166 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>>13405142
It's not fully clear to me what you want. E.g. why you're treating several n's at the same time. Or whether the index k enumerates points or coordinates.
The \forall at the beginning of the set comprehension is weird.

PS you can use \mid as bar, as in

\{u \in U \mid \mathrm{funky}(u, X) > 3 \}

(5 replies)