Hey science bros. Not sure if this is a fitting subject or not, but since there's not a health or medicine board I figured here might be the best place to ask.
Does anyone know anything about the long term effects of Dextromethorphan (DXM) abuse? I ask because I''ve been on and off abusing the stuff for over a decade now, and other than being surprised I'm not dead or catatonic at this point, I was wondering if any science or health bros had any ideas as to it's long term effects.
I can go into more detail if asked, but like I said, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask. I'm going to see a doctor about it soon-ish I just wanted to get an idea here first before I go.
>tfw IQ 135 >it is supposed to mean that my intelligence is above average >but i feel like an above average fool for fucking up my life with bad decisions and i continue doing bad things like being lazy and not fighting against it
One? Like its a natural phenomena, similar to gravity and time? And what if this one phenomena establishes itself in multiple objects like humans, animals etc. And what we experience as individuals is the different amount of electrons, thus you is made up out of a very specific amount. Hence why theres only 1 of you.
If you use the world /pol/ in any of your post, I know you're a midwit arguing in bad faith, and I will disregard whatever you have to say.
Scientific discourse happens through rational discussion and analysis of empirical evidence provided. Race, sex, age, academic title, religious or political beliefs are irrelevant to what makes sense scientifically, and what doesn't.
If you automatically assume that anyone who argues an hypothesis you believe is false comes from one evil dangerous place, you simply don't have the right mindset!
>But /pol/ is full of prejudice too! They call you a shilling! They are dumb! They are evil! They say X and Y!
See? You did it again. This is /sci/ not /pol/ and we don't care what happens there. Everyone, even dumb people, is free to argue about things, provided that they do their best to provide certain evidence (whether or not the evidence is fallacious can be easily discussed later).
If you ever use the word /pol/ on /sci/, you are the cancer that is killing this board, I won't give you any (you)s, and I invite everyone else to do so.
If nuclear is go great, why are only shithole countries like China, India and Russia are building them? All of the smart western countries are moving to gas, solar/wind and storage
As in, are the performance of random people on different physical tasks correlated with each other ?
Intuitively it seems true, as in, the military does physical fitness test, and they assume that these tests will correlated with job performance, in the same way that they assume mental tests will correlate with jobs performance.
