life is the hardest for people with 125 - 140 iq
smarter than most people but stupid compared to the actually smart people
where do people in this range go and what do they do

Prove it.

>Thunderf00t is bas-

Has it been proven a well developed brain from the right race can't raise their IQ substantially?
>In other words, who's to say IQ is not an acquired language and set of skills?

ITcels on Suicide Watch

>post yfw it turns out to be an alien megastructure

You should be able to solve this.

>1.4 billion people
>Hundreds of billions in funding
>High IQ
>Decades of stealing and copying shit
>Still can't do anything but make cheap plastic shit

How is this country still Africa-tier in terms of science and technology?

The abolition and general dissolution of the class system in Western societies has been a terrible mistake. We were warned by many philosophers of democracy's dysgenic affect on civilization but we didn't listen and now look were we are.
Although, we still have classes, our societies are no longer as stratified as one might hope them to be, and the lower classes are allowed privileges which should not belong to them, like voting and the rule over culture.

It is a basic fact that democracy and populism needs must give way to anarchism, yet nature through group selection seems to favour hierarchy and annihilates the populations which live in anarchy (especially as they get larger).

I do not advocate a simple caste system, à la the hindus, but the general promotion of the lower classes in society has been a disaster. What we should strive for is the noble """lie""" of Socrates, but founded upon genetic truth.
As we all know, there are some qualities which make some men more fit to rule than others. We as a society should artificially select for these qualities and establish hereditary lineages upon them or at the very least we must return to the older system were people had to prove their worth to their nation (i.e. there group) to be promoted, or come from a lineage that already has (the latter being a tried and true, but less precise form of the former.)

sup /math/
what does "extraordinarily big" mean exactly in the context of the numbers being discussed? what might "major findings" constitute?
and why is it impossible to count votes accurately? it seems like there should be some way to insure accurate counting on scales this large because other counts of similar or greater magnitude are achieved regularly, but applied mathematics has not achieved accurate counting in this sphere of math yet.
https://nationalfile.com/president-trump-on-audits-numbers-will-be-released-shortly-they-are-extraordinarily-big/