If someone is paying 4chan a special fee to have mods stalk and harasses them, does that necessarily mean that the person paying the fee is low IQ? If so, what are the upper bounds for the IQ of such a person?

calling this thing a "mars helicopter" feels pretentious but nonetheless i'm excited for its continued demonstrations. what i don't know is the practicality of this technology.

they can get this thing to hop maybe a kilometer at a time on a cold day, not very far. if this machine is scaled up with better batteries and bigger rotors into something that could actually transport small useful loads, would it still be more efficient than just using ejection mass to rocket things around mars instead? i kind of doubt it.

What is the maximum surface area of a sofa that you can move through a 90 degree turn in a corridor of unit width?

ANY MEDFAGS/UROLOGISTS IN HERE, ON THIS BOARD?

What can you tell about penetration of the female and if it's true that you've hit the Posterior Fornix that you will trigger an orgasm where female start 'shaking and crying' of joy because it triggers an orgasm from the entire clitoris and it's tracts and the entire vaginal parts at the same time?.

My confusion about this story was that if there is an A-spot (from Anterior/Posterior fornix) most female should know where it is just from mastrubating/playing with their dildo/viberatos right?.

This thread turned into an discussion about the posterior fornix.
https://archived.moe/b/thread/875148053/#q875148053

If your penis bends upwards and she sits missionary on top you need to be, mostly, more than 18,5cm in the vagina to reach the posterior fornix.

If a female starts crying and shaking out of an orgasm you most likely triggered those areas and because of the complex anatomy of the vagina you've steched and stimulated not just the tip of the clitoris but the entire organ (cause some consider the clit as an organ in another organ).

Apologies to bring this question in 'stonecoal' (broken English) but I need to know if this is true.

In the ancient world, a particular science was often associated with a particular culture on the basis of their excelling in that science. The Babylonians were eminent astronomers, being the first civilization to compute astronomical calculations instead of relying solely on naked-eye records, and so the classical authors perceived Babylonia as the 'land of astronomy'. The Egyptians had, from an early period, a keen interest in preserving the body through mummification for the afterlife, and thus became exceedingly knowledgeable on matters of medicine and anatomy. We thus find the sentiment of Egypt and Egyptians being intrinsically linked to successful medical practice in authors like Herodotus. And, as is well known, the science of mathematics, and especially geometry, became intimately linked with the Greeks due to their significant advancements in that field.

Now, my question is:
Do modern parallels exist? Do some countries, on the basis of their specific cultural spirit, excel in a particular science? Or has the world become too homogeneous for that?

Since relativity is a thing, if I ride a car at 90 mph and smash into a person, could it not appear that it is the person travelling 90 mph and smashing my car? How does one determine who accelerated first?

I realized that I really like maths in uni. I was always good at math but my teachers were always only focused on exams and solving questions in high school or uni. I'm currently studying CS and I love CS too.
Would it be too hard to double major CS and Math bros?

Would it be theoretically possible for a volcano or mountain as big as Olympus Mons to exist on Earth?

is there any footage of anyone making longitudinal circumnavigation of earth?