if the world is getting warmer then why is it snowing in brazil

Why you had to delete >>13428764
?
OP was just victim of a logic fallacy.

Do we have to get boosters like every other month now???

>Call them real numbers
>They actually don't exist
which one of you fuckers did it

Wikipedia defines a set as a collection of elements. But what is an element? Wikipedia defines an element as an object that belongs to a set. hmmm

Candida auris is the next big fake health scare from the medical soience community.
https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/index.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/

Look at table 4 and the notes just below it: out of 827 pregnant women, 700 got their first dose in the third trimester, meaning that 127 women got their first dose in the first two trimesters. Those 700 couldn't possibly have had a miscarriage, because miscarriages are defined as being in the first two trimesters. If they had a miscarriage they couldn't have been included in the study as they would have gotten the vaccine after completing their pregnancy.
So the only women who could have been included in the study and who could have had miscarriages are the 127 women who got their first dose in the first two trimesters.
Now let's look at miscarriages (spontaneous abortions): 104 cases in 127 women, meaning that getting vaxxed with an mRNA vaccine in the first two trimesters of pregnancy results in a miscarriage in 82% of cases.

The question that killed /sci/

I thought you guys were smart

How?

Why aren't there many attractive scientists?