Hi /sci/. So my daily commute bus ride is EXTREMELY bumpy. The vibration is enough to give me a mild headache afterwards. I'm concerned about potential brain damage from vibrating my brain like that daily. Anyone here have the expertise to comment on this? ty

It's either the bus or I pay $70+ daily for Uber...
inb4 i'm already retarded for posting this hhahahahahahahha

john titor is where

An EMF source of 240V DC has an internal resistance ri of 0.5? and has the following 4 resistor connected. Two resistors R1=5.5? and R2=8? are connected in series. They are then connected to a parallel branch of two resistors, R3=15? and R4=30?.

I'm trying to raise my IQ so I listen to it every day, will this make me smarter?

am i about to be a real researcher?

Reality to the human is like stars reflected in a pond. We can't actually see the world outside of our bodies, rather a logically consistent symbolic representation of it. Not only that, but we evolved to only detect things that are common dangers to us. For example to see different parts of the radio frequencies spectrum, we have to use our build in sensory organs to interact with entities that can interact with these radio frequencies. So, we know for a fact that the things around us are different from how we see them, but how different is the question. How different do you think they are? Also, do you think that something we can't detect could one day collide with our senses and potentially kill everyone? From a scientific perspective, what do you think the chances are?

Undergraduate textbooks, grad shortly

As a scientist, do you think in Bayesian terms?

Would hydrogen be a more economically/environmentally sustainable fuel source than fossil fuels? All the sources i've read up on have been conflicting. With the little knowledge I have about hydrogen, I know that it is a lot more dangerous to work with and a bit of a bitch to store compared to fossil fuels. And for the most part it seems that most fuel burning power plants could be retrofitted to burn hydrogen but this would obviously be costly. I guess my question is in the long term would it be worth making the switch?

how accurate is picrel, scientifically speaking? has science ever studied or quantified the power of TDS?