Threads by latest replies - Page 258

(28 replies)

how do we distinguish science from non-science???

No.14358228 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What logical, methodological, and mathematical features distinguish science from other academic disciplines, from pseudo-science, and from flat out disinformation?

If we want to promote science and factual public discourse, how should we restrict or limit the spread of pseudoscience and misinformation, and what logical and methodological criteria should we use to determine what should not be censored? What makes something settled science?
23 posts and 4 images omitted
(5 replies)
No.14361186 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is it worth going into STEM for nonwhites like myself? It seems like only white people have ever really contributed.
(5 replies)
No.14361223 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Ok sci, why does this?
I imagine two character with screen as a head, just flat plane or like LCD. So, when imagining these, which is more chad and which is more virgin? As I see it, the widescreen one must be chad, the other way around doesn't work. The square itself seems to have some quality of being more sidekick like.
This isn't about head shape, I don't know what exactly it tracks to, since imagining people with similar shaped heads of triangle or rectangle doesn't really seem to cause the same. But as abstract form, the head being literally a concept of a screen like an LCD, for some reason 16:9 just seems chad. Yea? No?
(5 replies)
(313 replies)
No.14351096 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
is he right or just on that copium because he's at deaths doorstep?
308 posts and 20 images omitted
(15 replies)

/study/ general

No.14360787 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>How does /sci/ study?
>How much does /sci/ study?
>Any study tips for people in STEM fields?
>Study tips for your specific major and/or specific courses also welcome.
10 posts and 1 image omitted
(15 replies)
No.14359966 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Explain p value
10 posts and 3 images omitted
(21 replies)
No.14358458 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Is quantum computing a meme? Pic unrelated.
16 posts omitted
(5 replies)

New Einstein

No.14361064 ViewReplyOriginalReport
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0087175

>The mass–energy–information equivalence principle proposed in 2019 and the information content of the observable matter in the universe estimated in 2021 represent two important conjectures, called the information conjectures. Combining information theory and physical principles of thermodynamics, these theoretical proposals made specific predictions about the mass of information as well as the most probable information content per elementary particle. Here, we propose an experimental protocol that allows for empirical verification of the information conjectures by confirming the predicted information content of elementary particles. The experiment involves a matter–antimatter annihilation process. When an electron–positron annihilates, in addition to the two 511 keV gamma photons resulting from the conversion of their rest masses into energy, we predict that two additional low energy photons should be detected, resulting from their information content erasure. At room temperature, a positron–electron annihilation should produce two ?50 µm wavelength infrared photons due to the information erasure. This experiment could, therefore, confirm both information conjectures and the existence of information as the fifth state of matter in the universe
(58 replies)
No.14359574 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Jannie is going through the catalog right now and deleting all of the stuff his leftist political bosses have trained him to delete.
Why not just openly publish a list of what we're not allowed to discuss, would save ppl the trouble of making all the content that was just deleted?
53 posts and 4 images omitted