So it's starting to look like pharmacy isn't the career path for me
>be Me >20 y/o college sophomore
>in the ARMY National Guard as a 35F (Intelligence Analyst) might be relevant sense this job requires you to have a TS security clearance >clearance might help in job placement in the future, especially with government jobs >Currently a biochemistry major but I'm like 90% sure I'm not going to enjoy this path if I keep it up. >Taking the biology class for the third time since I dropped it the two previous times, which should be a sign that I should consider something else or that not going to enjoy trying to go down the pharmacy route >Overall nowhere near as interested in pharmacy as I once was. If I'm not going to be passionate about this field I probably won't survive in pharmacy school. >College has an information technology degree program >Link: https://www.coastal.edu/computing/programs/it/ >This might be a better option since I could see myself actually excelling in the it field (ex. Sysadmin, web developer, Network admin, etc. Still deciding which one I would want to focus on) >I'm aware that both certs, experience, and networking is very important but that shouldn't be a problem since I'm in a college setting. Networking won't be a problem and I know either my town or nearby towns have companies that will offer internships. >Only immediate downside I can see from me going this route is that I'll be even further behind than I already am. However since the Army has paid for and is paying for most of my college tuition, graduating late isn't that big of an issue aside from my folks being annoyed by that.
Is it a good career path to go down? What's some advice you can give to a complete novice? I know very little about programming or home labs and stuff like that but I'm very willing to learn. Especially over the summer when I have more free time.
Also how much would my clearance help me in job hunting? Do employers care about that at all?
How do you feel about your grandchildren using google quantum 50 years from now
to find your entire search history and every post you made on asian basket weaving forum
from back when you were young?
Has anybody here ever studied dark matter and dark energy before? What are your theories about it? For those who don't know here is a quick rundown: Based on the current models of gravity (our best understanding of gravity that appears to be correct) we cannot accurately predict the movements of galaxies. The galaxy that looks like a feather behaves as if it weighs as much as an elephant. So either the science is wrong, or there is invisible matter that is causing the galaxy to behave differently. This is called "Dark Matter" and it is believed to be MORE abundant than regular matter. That means that in our galaxy there is more dark matter than there are visible substances (if the theory is right). There is ZERO evidence it exists besides the fact that the galaxy behaves differently than it "should."
And dark energy is similar, except the universe is expanding significantly faster than the scientists say it should. So either their measuring equipment is faulty, their science is flawed, or there is "dark energy" which is even MORE abundant than dark matter, which is causing the universe to expand faster than science says it should.
Dark Energy has NEVER been detected or confirmed to exist... and the only evidence so far is the hypothetical evidence that the universe is moving faster than scientists told us it would.
(meth-)amphetamines during the day, benzos in the night.
scientifically speaking, isn't this the ultimate lifehack? you're pushing your brain's clockrate to the maximum, running at 100% during the day then tune it down to 0% frequency and let your braincell cool down during the night. boom repeat till you're 90, then retire. why is this combo not openly encouraged by the FDA? obviously all high achieving people are on it? they just want the plebs to suffer?
Friendly reminder that global climate changes drastically without direct human intervention and blaming the current climate to humans is propaganda to control the people.
Okay /sci/, let's see if you are smart enough to pass some basic screening questions for the job I am hiring for.
1. Given the following scenario, what variables would you manipulate to try and make a collision occur? Say instance, a self-driving car is approaching an intersection with a yellow light for their direction of travel, there is also a car on the road following closely behind in the same direction, in the same lane. The two cars come to a stop without incident in the example. What variables would you manipulate in simulation to cause a collision?
2. Which of the following situations do you think is more risky: one where a car is braking up to -3 meters per second squared, or one where it is braking up to -8 meters per second squared?
