How long does it take to test the Type of Covid Variant?

What does sci think of ufo's now that they're basically declassified by officials and nobody knows what the fuck is going. Do you study them? Have you made any sense of what's going on?

Can /sci/ deduce how many more weeks until this comes true?
I thought that it was supposed to happen but supposedly mid-September is just when it starts and it won't be in full swing until [TBD]

How does this work? Why is it different times in different places? I don't understand how someone at the same time as right now can look at a clock and it says something different. Why?

Why do blacks have stronger bones and are more resistant to fractures than whites? Doesn't this make them more resilient humans? /pol/chuds BTFOd
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0085253815563552

If most people find body and pubic hair unattractive, then why the fuck do we have it? How does that make sense from an evolutionary standpoint?

Am I stupid for not understanding this exercise?

On page 440 of GEB, Hofstadter gives a puzzle to the reader, about two TNT proof-pairs. A pair of TNT Godel numbers forms a proof-pair when m is a valid TNT derivation and n is the last line of m.
Here are the two pairs. Hofstadter says that only one of them is valid and the other is not.

1.
m = 626,262,636,223,123,262,111,666,611,223,123,666,111,666
n = 123,666,111,666

2.
m = 626,262,636,223,123,262,111,666,611,223,333,262,636,123,262,111,666
n = 223,333,262,636,123,262,111,666

The last line of each m is the same as its n (611 is the Godel number symbolizing a line break) so that means that one of the two m numbers has to be an invalid derivation. Here is what they translate to:

1. $\forall a: !Sa=0$
$!S0=0$

2. $\forall a: !Sa=0$
$! \exists a:Sa=0$

But, BOTH of these derivations were used on pages 217 and 218 as examples of how to use TNT's rules of inference! And they're both derived in one step from the first line (which is an axiom of TNT) with no intermediary steps required! So which one of these derivations exactly is not valid? Or am I just retarded and missing something incredibly obvious?

Scientifically speaking, why am I a Microsoft fanboy? I use pretty much all of their products (Windows, Office, Xbox, Bing, Azure, Surface), and while all of it (sans Xbox) is used on my job, I really have no actual reason to use Microsoft. I could use Linux, LibreOffice, Steam, Google, AWS, any other laptop. I just use Microsoft because... It's Microsoft. I simply think their products are of high quality, even when they are not. What make this phenomenon happen in general, likewise with Apple and Nintendo fanboys?

Hello, I'm sharing this message to serve the common good. Have you ever heard of "the Bates Method?" You can restore your eyesight without glasses according to Dr. Bates. I've been practicing the last several days and noticed a huge improvement in my astigmatism. All of the techniques I've tried are so simple that it is hard to believe they work. Our vision becomes messed up from habitually straining our eyes and the Bates Method gives simple techniques that trick you into relaxing your eyes. I encourage you to look up "the Bates Method" because there are several websites that use it. All of them are free. Highly recommend and God bless you all.

You're telling me this piece of GARBAGE survived re-entry?

+Kubrick admits to directing the Moon Movies

https://www.bitchute.com/video/MTDpsDWz7NzB/