Threads by latest replies - Page 2476

(7 replies)
No.13694954 ViewReplyOriginalReport
When people talk about race realism on /sci/, why is the most common comparison always between Europeans and East-Asians? Isn't this highly disgenious? You are comparing the entirety of all Europeans agaisnt only a select group of Asia's peoples.
Shouldnt a more accurate comparison be between europeans and asians (all of them combined?)
2 posts omitted
(28 replies)
No.13690464 ViewReplyOriginalReport
what's the evolutionary advantage of me being autistic
23 posts and 2 images omitted
(5 replies)
No.13694775 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I'm a 4 year hikki hs dropout trying to better my life, through learning math and then later on science. I need someone to teach me how to use anki, I'm willing to pay $10-15 if what I'm taught is useful. I'm too retarded and anxious to watch any videos or read any manuals, I can only learn when I interact with others because my mind is in 1000 places.

Discord: mystic#8825
(9 replies)
No.13695086 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Okay, this is getting out of hand. What the FUCK is Havana Syndrome?
4 posts and 1 image omitted
(578 replies)

Spaceflight General - /sfg/

No.13691787 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
M.O.O.S.E. is the extreme sport of the future
previous: >>13689861
573 posts and 133 images omitted
(26 replies)
No.13693911 ViewReplyOriginalReport
If you were able to accelerate a bullet (let's say a 9mm, FMJ) to 99% of the speed of light and fire it from orbit towards earth, what would be the resulting radius of devastation?
21 posts and 2 images omitted
(215 replies)

IQ Thread

No.13669724 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Because IQ IS a measurement of one's intelligence and success in life:
>Engineer
>160+ IQ
>120k a year
And I'm only 32!
210 posts and 25 images omitted
(5 replies)
No.13694719 ViewReplyOriginalReport
/sci/bros...is this true?
(16 replies)
No.13695322 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What the heck is going on /sci/?
11 posts and 1 image omitted
(5 replies)
No.13695023 ViewReplyOriginalReport
how can one objectively tell signal apart from noise? everything seems to be some kind of arbitrary filtering based on preconceptions. what if the noise is the low frequency shit while the high frequency shit that looks like jitter is the real signal? what if the pattern is just an artifact of sampling bias? how can you really be sure what you call noise is noise and signal is signal?